Quote (Crunkt @ May 16 2023 04:09am)
but you said we live in an era
and you are now talking only about people that have time to think about philosophy and existentialism
so a 2500 year era? Socrates is more than 2000 years old... and that's just western philosophy.
you can try to be subjective and talk about some people in this era who theorized things such as ones perception of reality is subjective and therefore every outcome of humanity is subjective etc etc. But now you are just back pedalling your attempt at brilliance and reducing the argument to 'well ya philosophers say so'
Im talking about the modern age as in 20th century and on. Western mainstream philosophy during this era is very individualistic and if you look at it from the outside, you see that its correlated with quality of life. From a global perspective, poorer regions, with less prosperity overall and greater inequalities of wealth, are generally more preoccupied with objective truths, such as survival, basic needs, health, death, reproduction, family etc. They dont have time to question their own existence when theyre actively preoccupied with prolonging it. That's why i implied that existentialism is a 1st world problem in a provocative manner. Developed countries have effectively eliminated external threats, so we turn to our internal ones and ultimately face the meaninglessness of our own existence.
And no im not belittling philosophers. Im trying to put subjective anguish in perspective with the material, objective suffering that exists in this world.
This post was edited by Neptunus on May 15 2023 07:45pm