The Dems created, out of thin air, all this need to investigate crap. They did it because their carefully laid plans were falling apart because Hillary lost.
I don't understand why it has taken Dems/left/PaRD so long to realize/admit to this. After all, it's fairly obvious.



Whether or not Carter Page was still with the Trump campaign has nothing at all to do with the fact that spying on Page was another one of the Dems inroads to setting up a scenario where they could investigate Trump....just because he won the election.

As for Comey, a fair and just Congress should have applauded his firing, and not used it as another inroad to investigating Trump for more non-existent things. I mean the guy WAS a crook. "Oh Hillary destroyed the evidence, OK, we'll just close the investigation."






This IS what's "going on", whether anyone wants to admit it or not. ^^









/e Btw, the House has just issued fresh subpoenas to former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson, the former chief of staff to McGahn.
The latest ploy by the House is to subpoena so many people... that those people legally ignoring those subpoenas, will give the House enough illegal ammo to start impeachment proceedings.

Personally, I'd be embarrassed to be a Democrat in the House at this time.

This post was edited by Ghot on May 21 2019 02:41pm

and the expert on creating shit out of thin air speaks....

It's not really 'upper crust' to announce yourself like that.

a literal "I know you are but what am I" post.

F tier pard member.

Trump to his own AG:

"i'm fucked"

to call that meeting "attempted collusion" is a spin. the woman publicly stated she was not of the russian government.

this is a statement from DTJ on twitter to initial reactions. which was obviously reviewed by the mueller team. that team did not not charge him with perjury or obstruction. so we can assume the statements are not false.
it also includes the email chain in question leading to this.
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413

i don't see how accepting "dirt" is wrong at all imo, but my feelings are not law.
accepting dirt from non-government officials though, is something every runner for nearly every position would be guilty of.

you're using hindsight. that's a common mistake with legal matters. at the time it was pretty obvious that Don Jr had a meeting, in Trump tower no less, with a potential agent of the Russian govt. None of the leftists who were being hyperbolic at the time, afaik, knew it was "fake news".

for it to be a witch hunt they'd have had to know it was fake, which would be silly to suggest. politics is a dirty ass game, but if that's Trump's defense, then he's not something new he's just a shitty copy of what we already had. and should be investigated if something stinks.

keep in mind i've held the entire time that Trump didn't collude and that the investigation is a waste of time and money. but i got there using logic, not facts. witch hunt involves facts, in foresight, not hindsight.



you dont see why a govt official as big as the POTUS owing a favor to a foreign govt because they helped get them elected is wrong? wat?

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 21 2019 03:13pm

was the trump tower mentioning in the warrant used to start this investigation? the "investigation" against trump was still a witch-hunt.
what does "potential agent of russia" mean? just because they are from russia? is everyone from russia a "potential agent"?

the trump tower thing is an after-find. which would be perfectly fine, but there was still no basis to start this without looking at "fine-combed prosecutorial evidence" not part of the warrant.

this investigation has had near unlimited restrictions, for them to not find "anything" on "anyone" to use as "prosecutorial evidence", would mean they didn't do an investigation.

edit to your edit:
you are claiming debt when things can just be donated. you are also going back to accepting from "government". not from "everyone else"

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on May 21 2019 03:26pm

is this really the level of detail you research?





that's Don's email.

FORESIGHT means she could be a russian agent. hindsight tells us she isn't.

use FORESIGHT.

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/07/politics/donald-trump-jr-full-emails/

yada yada ya cnn, its just a transcript of his emails.



i have no clue wat this means.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 21 2019 03:33pm