d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1138713881389139013913169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 52,304
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jul 26 2017 10:52am
Quote (inkanddagger @ 26 Jul 2017 18:47)
So 2,500 people whose total cost is essentially a rounding error is a financial problem?

Yeah, Trump didn't talk to any fucking generals about this, he is using it to bargain repeal of Obamacare with the Freedom Caucus.


even if the costs arent a problem, they are still additional and unnecessary costs. why deal with the costs and all the trouble when the military can just as well recruit 2500 "cisgenders"?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 26 2017 10:53am
Member
Posts: 91,081
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 26 2017 10:55am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 26 2017 10:52am)
even if the costs arent a problem, they are still additional and unnecessary costs. why deal with the costs and all the trouble when the military can just as well recruit 2500 "cisgenders"?


Recruitment is free? Unnecessary is objective?

I think it's easier to make the case that a single bomb is less needed, and I'm sure the costs are comparable.
Member
Posts: 61,492
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 5.77
Jul 26 2017 10:58am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 26 2017 09:52am)
even if the costs arent a problem, they are still additional and unnecessary costs. why deal with the costs and all the trouble when the military can just as well recruit 2500 "cisgenders"?


The sunk costs of discharging people who have been serving for years, have already been through training, etc is far more.
Member
Posts: 52,304
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jul 26 2017 11:06am
i dont deny that a lot more money is wasted on a lot of occasions in the military. doesnt change the fact that recruiting transgenders instead of cisgenders causes additional costs.
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jul 26 2017 11:10am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 26 Jul 2017 17:06)
i dont deny that a lot more money is wasted on a lot of occasions in the military. doesnt change the fact that recruiting transgenders instead of cisgenders causes additional costs.


What costs?
Member
Posts: 91,081
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 26 2017 11:11am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 26 2017 11:06am)
i dont deny that a lot more money is wasted on a lot of occasions in the military. doesnt change the fact that recruiting transgenders instead of cisgenders causes additional costs.


Additional compared to never having allowed them, sure. Additional compared to banning them now, maybe maybe not.
Member
Posts: 52,304
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jul 26 2017 11:17am
Quote (thesnipa @ 26 Jul 2017 19:11)
Additional compared to never having allowed them, sure. Additional compared to banning them now, maybe maybe not.


hmm, fair point.

Quote (Scaly @ 26 Jul 2017 19:10)
What costs?


tons and tons of red tape. and the potential for shitty situations like the one with chelsea manning.
Member
Posts: 61,492
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 5.77
Jul 26 2017 11:18am
Support the troops unless they aren't white cis males. You people aren't patriots, you are fucking disgusting.
Member
Posts: 53,538
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 11,407.33
Jul 26 2017 11:19am
Quote (inkanddagger @ Jul 26 2017 01:18pm)
Support the troops unless they aren't white cis males. You people aren't patriots, you are fucking disgusting.


they wont be troops if you ban them from the military :thinkingblackguy:
Member
Posts: 91,081
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 26 2017 11:20am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 26 2017 11:17am)
hmm, fair point.



tons and tons of red tape. and the potential for shitty situations like the one with chelsea manning.


Does discharging 5,000 people early use white tape?

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1138713881389139013913169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll