Quote (Goomshill @ 26 Jul 2017 17:35)
After reading up on the DoD handbook and policy guidelines and current procedures for transgenders, I think I went from 'skeptical of the ban' to 'skeptical of allowing trans'
Thats a whole hell of a lot of red tape and special conditions for 5000 trannies, making them mandatory high maintenance after the bradley manning debacle
Gays in the military was a simple enough affair, just say "they're okay" and they serve like anyone else, didn't bother anyone. Not the case with the transgenders
Quote (ofthevoid @ 26 Jul 2017 17:40)
Also the elephant in the room which is these people are much more likely to be abused/victimized by fellow soldiers causing a lot of embarrassment for the armed forces. Next thing you know the media latches on, next thing you know there's marches in protest, they want reforms, etc. It's a whole lot of potential headaches for not so much benefit.
agreed.
and look at it like this: a captured US soldier being beheaded by islamists is a PR disaster. but imagine the even bigger PR disaster of a US soldier being held as a sex slave by islamists....
I also kinda agree with the argument trump alluded to in his tweet: soliders must be determined and quick decision makers. someone not even being able to make up his mind about his own gender raises a big red flag in this sense.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 26 2017 09:56am