d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2024
Prev1137138139140141281Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 17,176
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 19,646.95
Aug 28 2023 07:45pm
seems he's becoming more and more panicked by the day

Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Aug 28 2023 08:19pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Aug 28 2023 06:45pm)
seems he's becoming more and more panicked by the day

https://i.imgur.com/jwSjEir.png


The Ukrainian prosecutor was corrupt and multiple Western countries wanted him to be removed. That's why it's so absurd that he's being held out as some brave truth teller against the Bidens.

This post was edited by IceMage on Aug 28 2023 08:21pm
Member
Posts: 46,692
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Aug 28 2023 08:34pm
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 28 2023 09:19pm)
The Ukrainian prosecutor was corrupt and multiple Western countries wanted him to be removed. That's shy it's so absurd that he's being held out as some brave truth teller against the Bidens.


All those NATO powers were calling Shokin an honest and reliable prosecutor up until he started going after Zlochevsky. Through Shokin's term in the post-Maidan and up until late 2015, the Obama administration was praising him. There was no push to remove him until the moment he authorized seizing the property of Zlochevsky, who we know paid $5 million to Hunter Biden for the express purpose of getting Joe Biden to force Shokin to get off his back, and the evidence suggests he also paid $5 million to Joe Biden directly in bribes for this purpose. And then Joe Biden overtly did just that.


As a thought experiment, how much more proof of a quid pro quo could we possibly have? Assume Biden is guilty of taking bribes, what more could possibly be shown than money flowing to him, transcripts and documentation and witness testimony of a direct request of an illicit exchange of political favor for money, and then that favor being performed exactly as requested and done by weaponizing government policy? What's the higher bar to satisfy? Need a video with two forms of government ID, a police officer, his buddies taking notes and his grandmother to confirm his identity as he feels up a little girl?
Member
Posts: 37,792
Joined: Mar 12 2003
Gold: 1,449.00
Aug 28 2023 09:36pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 28 2023 09:34pm)
All those NATO powers were calling Shokin an honest and reliable prosecutor up until he started going after Zlochevsky. Through Shokin's term in the post-Maidan and up until late 2015, the Obama administration was praising him. There was no push to remove him until the moment he authorized seizing the property of Zlochevsky, who we know paid $5 million to Hunter Biden for the express purpose of getting Joe Biden to force Shokin to get off his back, and the evidence suggests he also paid $5 million to Joe Biden directly in bribes for this purpose. And then Joe Biden overtly did just that.


As a thought experiment, how much more proof of a quid pro quo could we possibly have? Assume Biden is guilty of taking bribes, what more could possibly be shown than money flowing to him, transcripts and documentation and witness testimony of a direct request of an illicit exchange of political favor for money, and then that favor being performed exactly as requested and done by weaponizing government policy? What's the higher bar to satisfy? Need a video with two forms of government ID, a police officer, his buddies taking notes and his grandmother to confirm his identity as he feels up a little girl?


Republicans already proved quid pro quos dont matter during impeachment #1, so what's the problem here?

Remember when trump told zelenskiy he was holding up aid money and weapons to Ukraine until Ukraine investigates Biden? Was that not a bribe/quid pro quo? Was that not an attempt to weaponize the government to influence an election?

There is actual proof of trumps quid quo pro, not some anonymous source who "heard Biden got paid $5 million from ukraine", but obviously none of that matters to the cult

Member
Posts: 15,799
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Aug 28 2023 09:38pm
Quote (Beeetlejuice @ Aug 28 2023 09:36pm)
Republicans already proved quid pro quos dont matter during impeachment #1, so what's the problem here?

Remember when trump told zelenskiy he was holding up aid money and weapons to Ukraine until Ukraine investigates Biden? Was that not a bribe/quid pro quo? Was that not an attempt to weaponize the government to influence an election?

There is actual proof of trumps quid quo pro, not some anonymous source who "heard Biden got paid $5 million from ukraine", but obviously none of that matters to the cult


Zelenskyy the hero of the left says you and the democrats are liars. I think I like him a little bit more now.
Member
Posts: 46,692
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Aug 28 2023 11:34pm
Quote (Beeetlejuice @ Aug 28 2023 10:36pm)
Republicans already proved quid pro quos dont matter during impeachment #1, so what's the problem here?

Remember when trump told zelenskiy he was holding up aid money and weapons to Ukraine until Ukraine investigates Biden? Was that not a bribe/quid pro quo? Was that not an attempt to weaponize the government to influence an election?

There is actual proof of trumps quid quo pro, not some anonymous source who "heard Biden got paid $5 million from ukraine", but obviously none of that matters to the cult


Because its not an illicit motive to seek to investigate corruption, because no aid was actually held up, and no demands made, and no money changed hands, and no US policy changed. Nobody died because Trump asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of the Biden bribery ring.

Its some kind of demented 'no u' to suggest that someone taking millions in bribes for corrupt actions of behalf of a foreign interest that dragged us into a bloody war is perfectly okay, but someone saying "we should look into that" is committing an impeachable offense.
Member
Posts: 104,579
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Aug 29 2023 12:15am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Aug 26 2023 10:52am)
new polls: please tell me your conclusions (without jumping, that is an important point, i will give mines after):

https://i.imgur.com/IjSYETo.png


https://i.imgur.com/BjZefZn.png



https://i.imgur.com/huE6lDf.png





Uh... the Democrats hate Trump?
Member
Posts: 39,262
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Aug 29 2023 04:08am
Quote (gnarjay @ Aug 28 2023 06:45pm)
seems he's becoming more and more panicked by the day

https://i.imgur.com/jwSjEir.png


they talking bout bogus dudes corruption so? bogues dude even brags about it in public. he has the loyalty of the TDS. that TDS is some powerful chit like a zombie parasite


Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 28 2023 10:34pm)
Because its not an illicit motive to seek to investigate corruption, because no aid was actually held up, and no demands made, and no money changed hands, and no US policy changed. Nobody died because Trump asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of the Biden bribery ring.

Its some kind of demented 'no u' to suggest that someone taking millions in bribes for corrupt actions of behalf of a foreign interest that dragged us into a bloody war is perfectly okay, but someone saying "we should look into that" is committing an impeachable offense.


we come to this again. investigating biden is how biden got put on the ticket. they put biden on the ticket then investigated trump for investigating a candidate rival. if trump never looked into ukrane bogus dude would of never been 'president
Member
Posts: 46,692
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Aug 29 2023 04:20am
https://nypost.com/2023/08/28/national-archives-admits-it-has-5400-biden-pseudonym-emails/
and speaking of

Turns out there are 5400 emails in the national archives, hidden from the public, which Joe Biden participated in under his pseudonyms of "Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters, and JRB Ware". The fake names he used while involved in Hunter Biden's Ukrainian bribery ring.
There's no real way to know without seeing the emails whether they contain any significant evidence, since all we know is he used the pseudonyms as one of his layers of obfuscation.

If investigators ever untangled the financial web used to launder money to Biden, that would be the true smoking gun of direct bribery. Until then, its "just" a quid pro quo with payments to his family members in exchange for corrupt foreign policy requests that's been proven, and an orgy of evidence that Joe Biden was being paid directly, short of proof. Definitely enough that if Joe Biden didn't have the wagons circled around him and the vagueness of vice presidential immunity, he'd already be on trial.
Member
Posts: 26,957
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 29 2023 07:13am
all these MAGA peeps crying and worrying about peoples integrity while defending the 0 integrity fat man is peak brainwashing.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1137138139140141281Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll