great! i love ammunition! lets go!
1. I posted a meme the other day, Oct 7th is like, season 5 of Game of Thrones, Israel was bombing Gaza on Oct 6th. You are deflecting. The fact is Israel bombed a civilian population into the stone age for approximately 17 months and 14 days. If you deflect and say but but Oct 7th, then I would refer you to another recent post of mine where i outlined Israel has killed more ppl in the last 4 days then were killed on Oct 7th. Its like someone saying "you bombed them for 17 months" and the response is: yes but they they attacked us first on Oct 7th, and the response is, oh, but what about Oct 6th then !? also the Yanks told you that gassing the tunnels would be bad optics, glad we didnt have to see that. Also glad your politicians suggestion to Nuke Gaza also was not widely supported (again, bad optic's i guess!)
2. There you go deflecting again. Israel is the one blocking the trucks from entering, and israel is the one bombing schools and hospitals. its difficult to give your argument merit when noting every hospital has been destroyed and you have cut off the electricity. your not good at this.
3. The Jewish Institute for National Security of America. While JINSA generally supports Israel’s right to self-defense, it has emphasized the importance of ensuring that humanitarian aid reaches civilians in conflict zones, including Gaza. JINSA has also advocated for a strategic approach that balances security with minimizing harm to innocent civilians, though it stops short of explicitly calling for a full ceasefire. obvious i wont mention the US Gov, WHO, IAEA, EU, UN or ICRC as these are all "biased" based on your previous statements.
4. Ethnic cleansing. ok well news flash: what we have seen in gaza over the last 17 months, meets the definition of ethnic cleansing. Its only the genocide tag thats not sticking. the Ethnic Cleansing tag sticks. you can read up on this yourself.
5. noted, but i already knew this.
6. over the last 17 months, there have been mass civilian casualties. are you saying that there were not mass civilian casualties on Oct 7th ?
7. your right, its a misleading comparison, as MORE BOMBS were dropped on Gaza. my bad.
false equivalencies, selective outrage, and a complete disregard for context
1. This is a deliberate distortion. There was no war before October 7th. Israel conducted limited precision strikes against Hamas military targets in response to rocket attacks. Hamas, on the other hand, launched a full-scale massacre, brutally murdering 1,200 civilians and taking 250 hostages something no country would tolerate.
And comparing the number of deaths post-October 7th is meaningless. Hamas started the war and continues to use civilians as human shields. That’s the difference between terrorism and self-defense.
Your “optics” argument about gas and nuclear weapons is just noise. Israel did neither. Meanwhile, Hamas’s actual war crimes are on full display but you don’t seem to care.
2. Completely false. More than 13,000 aid trucks have entered Gaza. The real problem? Hamas steals the aid, stockpiles it for fighters, and even attacks humanitarian convoys.
Hospitals and schools? Hamas militarized them. That’s why they’re targeted. Pretending Israel is just bombing them for fun ignores the reality of Hamas turning civilian infrastructure into terror bases.
And let’s talk about electricity Israel stopped supplying it because Hamas attacked and massacred Israeli civilians. Why should Israel provide utilities to a terrorist group that just murdered its people?
3. Sure, aid should reach civilians and Israel has facilitated it. But acting like Israel is responsible for all suffering while ignoring Hamas’s theft, smuggling tunnels, and weapon stockpiles in aid centers is dishonest.
You also list organizations like the UN, WHO, and ICRC which have a long history of relying on Hamas-controlled sources for their reports. Meanwhile, Hamas terrorists were found working for UNRWA but I’m sure that detail slipped your mind.
4. Laughable. Ethnic cleansing means deliberately removing a population yet millions of Palestinians still live in Gaza. Israel is fighting Hamas, not trying to wipe out Palestinians. If it were, Gaza wouldn’t exist anymore.
Meanwhile, Hamas’s stated goal is to ethnically cleanse Jews from Israel. Their charter calls for the extermination of Jews worldwide. So tell me again who’s really pushing for ethnic cleansing?
6. Yes, because Hamas deliberately hides behind civilians. If Hamas fought like a conventional army, the civilian toll would be much lower. But Hamas chooses to embed itself in schools, hospitals, and apartment buildings so they can cry “war crimes” when Israel retaliates.
And equating Hamas’s deliberate civilian massacre on October 7th with Israel targeting terrorists is disgusting. One side is committing intentional war crimes, the other is trying to stop them.
7. This is one of the dumbest comparisons anti-Israel activists love to push.
Hiroshima was a single nuclear bomb designed for mass civilian deaths.
Israel is using precision-guided munitions to target Hamas infrastructure.
The total tonnage of bombs means nothing without context. More small, targeted strikes ≠ one massive, indiscriminate attack.
And why does Israel need to drop so many bombs? Because Hamas built an underground terror fortress beneath Gaza 500 kilometers of tunnels, filled with weapons, command centers, and hostages. That’s the reality of the battlefield Israel is facing.
Your entire argument ignores one simple fact:
Hamas started this war. Hamas refuses to surrender. Hamas hides behind civilians.
If Hamas laid down its arms today, the war would end.
If Israel laid down its arms today, there would be genocide.That’s the real difference.
This post was edited by Many_Names on Mar 21 2025 02:26pm