d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev1136137138139140183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Oct 19 2016 02:31pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 19 2016 12:31pm)
Obviously you want your VR pussy grabbed....


you flat earth hallucination is noted
Member
Posts: 92,973
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 19 2016 02:32pm
Quote (majorblood @ Oct 19 2016 02:26pm)
the natasha stoynoff story where she claims the butler bursts into the room and stops the sexual assault? the butler said this never happened and she's a journalist and did not record anything he said (she forget how to use her recorder?)


And Melania claims that she never saw Natasha after, but there is another witness who claims she was there when Mel/nat ran into each other.

You were right to be skeptical, hell im skeptical of each of the stories myself, but there are CONFLICTING witness accounts. That's not "completely without evidence and easily refutable" to use your words.

But hey if you want to act like you did research and are being objective be my guest, just don't expect me to buy it.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 19 2016 02:36pm
Quote (majorblood @ Oct 19 2016 10:31am)
you flat earth hallucination is noted


Heliocentric/Geometric explanation for Selenelion Eclipses which are a Lunar eclipse when the Sun and Moon are both in view? Keep living the VR dream.

Member
Posts: 19,898
Joined: May 10 2009
Gold: 1.50
Oct 19 2016 03:15pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 19 2016 03:36pm)
Heliocentric/Geometric explanation for Selenelion Eclipses which are a Lunar eclipse when the Sun and Moon are both in view? Keep living the VR dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYClIRXKiT4


Another flat earth nutter with a degree from Youtube University.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 19 2016 04:53pm
Quote (Morphmcmanerson @ Oct 19 2016 11:15am)
Another flat earth nutter with a degree from Youtube University.


I guess all these organizations and people are negated if anyone ever talks about them on video:

Space.com
Nasa.gov
Micheal Zeiler
The Bible
Vedic Astrology/Cosmology
Cartographers/Map Makers
Royal Astronomical Society
Royal Observatory

Way to find an excuse to keep yourself blind and not even understand a tiny video, lol gj beta. If only Corporations are allowed to feed us with their bias - your opinion is not valid.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 19 2016 04:55pm
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Oct 19 2016 05:08pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 19 Oct 2016 12:32)
And Melania claims that she never saw Natasha after, but there is another witness who claims she was there when Mel/nat ran into each other.

You were right to be skeptical, hell im skeptical of each of the stories myself, but there are CONFLICTING witness accounts. That's not "completely without evidence and easily refutable" to use your words.

But hey if you want to act like you did research and are being objective be my guest, just don't expect me to buy it.



So weird how 'following the evidence' led to the conclusion he wanted.
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 19 2016 05:11pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 19 2016 03:36pm)
Heliocentric/Geometric explanation for Selenelion Eclipses which are a Lunar eclipse when the Sun and Moon are both in view? Keep living the VR dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYClIRXKiT4


http://www.space.com/13856-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-senelion.html

Fucked by basic physics again.

Quote
Seeing the impossible

But wait! How is this possible? When we have a lunar eclipse, the sun, Earth and moon are in a geometrically straight line in space, with the Earth in the middle. So if the sun is above the horizon, the moon must be below the horizon and completely out of sight (or vice versa).

And indeed, during a lunar eclipse, the sun and moon are exactly 180 degrees apart in the sky; so in a perfect alignment like this (a "syzygy") such an observation would seem impossible.

But it is atmospheric refraction that makes a selenelion possible.

Atmospheric refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher in the sky than they are in reality.

For example: when you see the sun sitting on the horizon, it is not there really. It's actually below the edge of the horizon, but our atmosphere acts like a lens and bends the sun's image just above the horizon, allowing us to see it.

This effect actually lengthens the amount of daylight for several minutes or more each day; we end up seeing the sun for a few minutes in the morning before it has actually risen and for a few extra minutes in the evening after it actually already has set.

The same holds true with the moon, as well.

As a consequence of this atmospheric trick, for many localities there will be an unusual chance to observe a senelion firsthand with Saturday morning's shadowy event. There will be a short window of roughly 1-to-6 minutes (depending on your location) when you may be able to simultaneously spot the sun rising in the east-southeast and the eclipsed full moon setting in the west-northwest.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Oct 19 2016 05:12pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 19 2016 12:32pm)
And Melania claims that she never saw Natasha after, but there is another witness who claims she was there when Mel/nat ran into each other.

You were right to be skeptical, hell im skeptical of each of the stories myself, but there are CONFLICTING witness accounts. That's not "completely without evidence and easily refutable" to use your words.

But hey if you want to act like you did research and are being objective be my guest, just don't expect me to buy it.


whether or not melania met natasha 10+ years ago isn't in question (because it doesn't matter) but sexual assault without evidence supporting it and a witness she claims "burst into the room" directly refuting it is

This post was edited by majorblood on Oct 19 2016 05:13pm
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Oct 19 2016 05:32pm


This post was edited by lithfkn on Oct 19 2016 05:33pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 19 2016 05:34pm
Quote (Santara @ Oct 19 2016 01:11pm)


their excuse "Atmospheric refraction" is not possible because if the "atmosphere" works as a lense and refracts light then they must also explain whether the "atmosphere"
is:
1. )( = Concave
2. () = Convex
or what i would say mostly resemble what is called a meniscus or (( <------like that
So from wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics)
Convex-concave (meniscus) lenses can be either positive or negative, depending on the relative curvatures of the two surfaces. A negative meniscus lens has a steeper concave surface and is thinner at the centre than at the periphery. Conversely, a positive meniscus lens has a steeper convex surface and is thicker at the centre than at the periphery. An ideal thin lens with "two surfaces of equal curvature" would have zero optical power, meaning that it would neither converge nor diverge light.
nor curve/create mirage shadows from objects that arent completly parrelel

Sun worship busted yet again.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1136137138139140183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll