d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev1134135136137138183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 19 2016 12:09am
Quote (NekoSama @ Oct 18 2016 03:20pm)
Beta scholars are not known for having the balls to fight wars.

Having the instinct and drive to protect your family and family and friends is the start of a good soldier.


You known whose nickname was "Beta" - Eratosthenes, how did he do getting you to cuck to a ball Earth?
Member
Posts: 11,264
Joined: Sep 8 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 19 2016 05:25am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Oct 19 2016 05:37am)
I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.


Someone who does honest things in a dishonest way > someone who does dishonest things in a dishonest way > Trump.

This post was edited by Interesting on Oct 19 2016 05:26am
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 19 2016 05:46am
Quote (Interesting @ Oct 19 2016 06:25am)
Someone who does honest things in a dishonest way > someone who does dishonest things in a dishonest way > Trump.


> implying Clinton does honest things.
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Oct 19 2016 06:02am
Quote (majorblood @ Oct 19 2016 06:02am)
trump had a great reply to that


Vouch.
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 19 2016 06:13am
Quote (Santara @ Oct 19 2016 07:46am)
> implying Clinton does honest things.


Well, compared to Trump.
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 19 2016 06:14am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Oct 19 2016 01:37am)
I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.


She wasn't comparing herself to Lincoln. She was explaining that when she originally made the statement about private and public positions, it was in reference to Abraham Lincoln and explaining what the pragmatic benefit of it is. Honestly, I find that view to be admirable.

And she's nowhere near as untrustworthy as Trump. 20% maybe.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 19 2016 06:16am
Member
Posts: 11,264
Joined: Sep 8 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 19 2016 08:53am
Quote (Santara @ Oct 19 2016 11:46am)
> implying Clinton does honest things.



Well, other than giving state secrets to terrorists, murdering real-estate co-investors, personally driving illegals over the border to vote for her, shooting Ambassador Stevens with a sniper rifle, and whatever the fuck all you other loons think she's done.
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Oct 19 2016 10:52am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Oct 18 2016 10:37pm)
I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.


You are terrible at reading, and apparently are terrible at listening, too.

Quote (majorblood @ Oct 18 2016 11:02pm)
trump had a great reply to that


Yes, his brilliant reply was to blow hot air into the microphone in a fit of incoherence in order to completely embarrass himself. It took a grand total of about 4 minutes for the journalist contingent on the Twittersphere to confirm that, indeed, the example in question really did come from Clinton's description of Lincoln's maneuvering of Congress, and Clinton had cited her previous use of the example accurately and fairly in the debate. Trump looked dumb for mocking her in hindsight, and everyone else who would later go on to continue mocking her look even dumber than he did.

Edit: Spelling.

This post was edited by Pollster on Oct 19 2016 10:52am
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 19 2016 11:02am
Quote (Pollster @ 19 Oct 2016 12:52)
You are terrible at reading, and apparently are terrible at listening, too.



Yes, his brilliant reply was to blow hot air into the microphone in a fit of incoherence in order to completely embarrass himself. It took a grand total of about 4 minutes for the journalist contingent on the Twittersphere to confirm that, indeed, the example in question really did come from Clinton's description of Lincoln's maneuvering of Congress, and Clinton had cited her previous use of the example accurately and fairly in the debate. Trump looked dumb for mocking her in hindsight, and everyone else who would later go on to continue mocking her look even dumber than he did.

Edit: Spelling.



Hey buddy!!!! she isn't maneuvering Congress here. Shes saying "free college and fuck wall street" to the masses for votes in public then saying "lol free college wont happen cant happen and wall street is best equipped to fix our economy. Oh btw it'd be great to have a rich businessperson as president" in private to rich, elite, powerful and influential institutions.

You dare justify invoking Honest Abe Lincoln in this manner?

Obligatory: thanks for yet another fuckin laugh!
Member
Posts: 120,285
Joined: May 18 2013
Gold: 1.66
Oct 19 2016 11:10am
i just dont understand these trump supporters. the last 3-4 people i talked to in real life about who they want. they all said trump. is it just me or does trump remind you of the super villain in every movie?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1134135136137138183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll