Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 18 Oct 2016 18:29)
Whoa, political parties like to keep their big donors happy, holy fuck, Clinton is definitely going down this time.
Glad to see how quickly I can get you to change the subject, at least. Enjoy your post in the thread for winners. :D
What you call making big donors happy may actually be a violation of federal campaign finance law and collusion between the DNC and Clinton campaign. But I'm not exactly sure what leak you are referencing since you didn't quote anything.
Also, does associating yourself with a winning presidential candidate make yourself feel like more of a winner and give you a sense of superiority over other people? That seems to be the case based on this thread title, which I've always thought was a little pretentious and pathetic.
Are people "losers" for voting for Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000 since Bush was the winner? That sort of language seems silly to me. But if it makes you feel more valuable and superior to other people to support the blatantly obvious better presidential candidate, then go for it, I suppose.