d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev1133134135136137183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Oct 18 2016 05:29pm
Whoa, political parties like to keep their big donors happy, holy fuck, Clinton is definitely going down this time.

Glad to see how quickly I can get you to change the subject, at least. Enjoy your post in the thread for winners. :D
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Oct 18 2016 06:15pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 18 Oct 2016 18:29)
Whoa, political parties like to keep their big donors happy, holy fuck, Clinton is definitely going down this time.

Glad to see how quickly I can get you to change the subject, at least. Enjoy your post in the thread for winners. :D


What you call making big donors happy may actually be a violation of federal campaign finance law and collusion between the DNC and Clinton campaign. But I'm not exactly sure what leak you are referencing since you didn't quote anything.

Also, does associating yourself with a winning presidential candidate make yourself feel like more of a winner and give you a sense of superiority over other people? That seems to be the case based on this thread title, which I've always thought was a little pretentious and pathetic.

Are people "losers" for voting for Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000 since Bush was the winner? That sort of language seems silly to me. But if it makes you feel more valuable and superior to other people to support the blatantly obvious better presidential candidate, then go for it, I suppose.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Oct 18 2016 06:41pm
Quote (excellence @ Oct 18 2016 03:25pm)
meanwhile Mrs. Huma Danger toils to make sure underboss Soros is happy
https://i.sli.mg/fiXVXy.jpg


Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Oct 18 2016 06:44pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ 18 Oct 2016 16:15)
What you call making big donors happy may actually be a violation of federal campaign finance law and collusion between the DNC and Clinton campaign. But I'm not exactly sure what leak you are referencing since you didn't quote anything.

Also, does associating yourself with a winning presidential candidate make yourself feel like more of a winner and give you a sense of superiority over other people? That seems to be the case based on this thread title, which I've always thought was a little pretentious and pathetic.

Are people "losers" for voting for Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000 since Bush was the winner? That sort of language seems silly to me. But if it makes you feel more valuable and superior to other people to support the blatantly obvious better presidential candidate, then go for it, I suppose.


Didn't we already cover this overreaction to me fucking around with Trump supporters? Are you a goldfish?

And yes, it's super hard to figure out what I meant when I posted directly under an email and used the exact wording used in that post. Reading is hard af. :(
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Oct 18 2016 07:20pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2016 04:37pm)
Marines aren't known for being the most mentally competent. Turns out critical thought doesn't make you likely to go where you're told and shoot who they tell you to shoot.


Beta scholars are not known for having the balls to fight wars.

Having the instinct and drive to protect your family and family and friends is the start of a good soldier.

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 18 2016 11:32pm


lies about the most trivial things :wacko: should be obvious twitter is a bit above the se(c)retary's capabilities
then again this and all the other lies should have been clear when she admitted to sniper fire in bosnia with ryan lochte and brian williams, and also having two positions on the same subject depending on the average wealth and power of the crowd because honest abraham lincoln.
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Oct 18 2016 11:37pm
Quote (excellence @ 19 Oct 2016 00:32)
https://i.sli.mg/4E7ZJK.jpg

lies about the most trivial things :wacko: should be obvious twitter is a bit above the se(c)retary's capabilities
then again this and all the other lies should have been clear when she admitted to sniper fire in bosnia with ryan lochte and brian williams, and also having two positions on the same subject depending on the average wealth and power of the crowd because honest abraham lincoln.


I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 18 2016 11:41pm
some wikileaks today ? in how much hours ?
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 18 2016 11:49pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 19 Oct 2016 01:41)
some wikileaks today ? in how much hours ?

prob ~6:00 eastern time (am)
12:00 GMT

Quote (ThatAlex @ 19 Oct 2016 01:37)
I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.


""I cannot tell a lie" -George Washington" -H

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 18 2016 11:49pm
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Oct 19 2016 12:02am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Oct 18 2016 09:37pm)
I couldn't believe it when she responded to the "private and public positions" question by comparing herself to Abraham Lincoln. It was a ridiculous diversion, and the press should have hammered her for it.

She's the polar opposite of honest - she's the most untrustworthy presidential candidate since Richard Nixon in 1972. She lies about even the most trivial things.


trump had a great reply to that
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1133134135136137183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll