Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 10:34am)
Why are you pretending it's necessary when the abstract has it in black and white?
Okay, I guess I need to explain this then.
Claims that are published in a reputable journal are not necessarily fact. They have an incentive to make their conclusions sound more significant than they actually are. They can't make wild end-all-be-all claims because it wouldn't get published, but every paper goes out of its way to hype its own conclusions where it can. Even Nature, arguably the best science journal in the world, has retractions when others cannot replicate their data, or when reviewers make mistakes.
Also, one data point doesn't mean ANYTHING without also understanding the body of knowledge that the data is based on, and the evolving field it is being published into. Unless you understand both the data collection, analysis, and the rest of the field you are not qualified to make a meaningful statement on the significance of the conclusions.