Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Jul 2017 01:53)
no, im implying that CNN is as hell-bent to spin each and every story against trump as breitbart is hell-bent on spinning everything against liberals/Democrats.
as I said: the phrasing in the CNN article is very suggestive and tendentious: "voting history" is - in my opinion - deliberately stated without further explanation to give the impression that the trump administration wants to find out who voted for whom, while they infact just want to know who went to vote in which years. as you can see in Knaapie's comments, this spin works just fine with those readers who are eager to hear something negative about trump.
so using the term "voting history" makes this a breitbart-like spin somehow? sry, but even though the left wing bias of cnn is well documented and hardly deniable, equating it to breitbart in terms of journalistic standards and integrity is outright moronic. but i guess this is exactly what trump intended to do and for some ppl it obviously worked... to me it just looks like you're desperately trying to construct something here to delegitimise this particular news.
so apparently you personally think the current administration's attempts to acquire that data is not something "negative", huh? interesting what kind of information you're willing to provide to the state based on completely unproven claims by someone who just can't accept the fact that they lost the popular vote... i hope this is just you compromising your values and principles to make excuses for trump and not your actual, unbiased opinion...
This post was edited by fender on Jun 30 2017 08:41pm