d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Cartoon Thread
Prev1132133134135136280Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 84466Replies: 2790Track Topic
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#1331
Mar 7 2016 06:11am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 05:34am)
I think Democrats disapprove of voter ID because they benefit from the illegal enfranchisement of non-citizens.


Disenfranchisement of citizens, you dummy. We're talked about this so much, it is hard to believe you are still struggling with comprehension.

Voter ID laws are also the first step to RFID chips being implanted in us in order to vote and do stuff like that, as technology develops.

Who knew the GOP would be the guys advocating the Mark of the Beast that those Rapture-fan fiction guys rant and rave about so much, all in the name of keeping poor blacks from being able to vote.

Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1332
Mar 7 2016 08:20am
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 7 2016 06:11am)
Disenfranchisement of citizens, you dummy. We're talked about this so much, it is hard to believe you are still struggling with comprehension.

Voter ID laws are also the first step to RFID chips being implanted in us in order to vote and do stuff like that, as technology develops.

Who knew the GOP would be the guys advocating the Mark of the Beast that those Rapture-fan fiction guys rant and rave about so much, all in the name of keeping poor blacks from being able to vote.


Citizens can get an ID ezpz, illegal aliens cannot. You can pretend it's about disenfranchisement all you want, but it's really about illegal enfranchisement.

Voter ID isn't the first step silly, national ID is. And national ID is your party's idea. Thanks, but no thanks.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#1333
Mar 7 2016 08:23am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 09:20am)
Citizens can get an ID ezpz, illegal aliens cannot. You can pretend it's about disenfranchisement all you want, but it's really about illegal enfranchisement.

Voter ID isn't the first step silly, national ID is. And national ID is your party's idea. Thanks, but no thanks.


Illegals are not voting. These phantom problems you guys make up have expensive solutions that don't solve anything, and in this case, adds an unconstitutional poll tax.

It cannot cost money to vote and government issued IDs cost money to buy.

This is as stupid as drug testing welfare people. You're such a statist pig sometimes.

This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 7 2016 08:24am
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
#1334
Mar 7 2016 08:23am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 09:20am)
Citizens can get an ID ezpz, illegal aliens cannot. You can pretend it's about disenfranchisement all you want, but it's really about illegal enfranchisement.

Voter ID isn't the first step silly, national ID is. And national ID is your party's idea. Thanks, but no thanks.


Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#1335
Mar 7 2016 08:27am
Quote (duffman316 @ Mar 7 2016 09:23am)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seVdI6FGjk0


Lawl
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1336
Mar 7 2016 08:39am
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 7 2016 08:23am)
Illegals are not voting. These phantom problems you guys make up have expensive solutions that don't solve anything, and in this case, adds an unconstitutional poll tax.

It cannot cost money to vote and government issued IDs cost money to buy.

This is as stupid as drug testing welfare people. You're such a statist pig sometimes.


Why you lying? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/10/24/study-considers-if-illegal-non-citizen-votes-sway-u-s-elections/

Quote
According to the author’s preview published Friday, more than 14 percent of non-citizens in 2008 and 2010 “indicated” they were registered to vote and some did.

“Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010,” wrote Richman and Earnest.

They note that non-citizens tend to be Democratic voters and that in their 2008 sample, 80 percent of non-citizens cast ballots for Obama. Given that, they conclude that non-citizen participation “was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.”
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#1337
Mar 7 2016 08:57am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 09:39am)
Why you lying? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/10/24/study-considers-if-illegal-non-citizen-votes-sway-u-s-elections/


Oh, one study, published on a DIY study publishing website, cited by Breitbart, says so?

Dude, quality matters. We can't even look at the data, and Breitbart are known liars. Known. We all know they lie, all the fucking time.

I don't know why you bother copying and pasting this trash, maybe the other people on Stormfront are receptive to this and infowars.

This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 7 2016 08:58am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1338
Mar 7 2016 09:01am
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 7 2016 08:57am)
Oh, one study, published on a DIY study publishing website, cited by Breitbart, says so?

Dude, quality matters. We can't even look at the data, and Breitbart are known liars. Known. We all know they lie, all the fucking time.

I don't know why you bother copying and pasting this trash, maybe the other people on Stormfront are receptive to this and infowars.


It was published by Elsevier, usually reputable.

Although you're right, there isn't a chance he or the authors of the article actually read and understood the paper, so just copying and pasting the data doesn't mean shit. Let me see if I can get it through my school.



Can't get it through my school. Even if it is methodologically sound, he's falling into the trap like he did with the mammogram discussion with PP a while back. One article does not a consensus make.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Mar 7 2016 09:07am
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1339
Mar 7 2016 09:10am
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 7 2016 08:57am)
Oh, one study, published on a DIY study publishing website, cited by Breitbart, says so?

Dude, quality matters. We can't even look at the data, and Breitbart are known liars. Known. We all know they lie, all the fucking time.

I don't know why you bother copying and pasting this trash, maybe the other people on Stormfront are receptive to this and infowars.


Harvard study, based on CCES data. Ad hom less.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1340
Mar 7 2016 09:29am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 7 2016 09:10am)
Harvard study, based on CCES data. Ad hom less.


It's not ad hominem. There isn't enough time in the world to sift through all the crap out there, so when you come across serious indicators of poor quality it's more efficient to just move on. A broken clock may be right twice a day, but you probably shouldn't waste time finding out when those two seconds are and just buy a new clock.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1132133134135136280Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact