lmao. They are dedicated to yellow journalism bashing trump and republicans.

I went through their compiled list of "lies and misleading claims" and it was the equivalent to trump saying "i like red" and wapo responding with, "there are more colors than red, and other people might have reasons for liking different colors. did you know blue is popular?"

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jun 20 2017 04:25am

Pretty indistinguishable from Politifact at this point. "Fact checking" has to be my most despised propaganda euphemism to come out of the past couple decades

That's totally a statistical argument.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/20/georgia-election-results-ossoff-handel-239778

ELECTIONS
Handel wins Georgia special election
The Republican won an expensive battle after the House seat became a focus of Democrats nationwide rallying against Trump.


Democrats and the mainstream media (redundant i know) billed this as a "massive referendum" on President Trump and spent tons of money to lose again.

Running an empty suit pajama rent boy that didnt even live there was another genuinely genius move by the "smart party"

Here is the reaction at buzzfeed 2.0 HQ



Bahahhahahahahah, once again President Trump ezpks the liberal losers and #fakenews media

[√] winning [ ] not winning

So a Trump cultist froze a multiple hour broadcast at just the right time for the faces of the analysts to look neutral?

Nice job T_D... a brilliant piece of evidence.

>reeee drumpf cultist waaah

youre a broken record in spirit and in posting content

what raddatz the "debate moderator" crying on election night when President Trump won wasnt enough proof?

it's more like the donald saying "i like red. i've always liked red. it's the best, it's fantastic. i'm gonna paint the white house red, believe me!" - while he's on record saying red is a stupid colour, that he personally likes blue more. also, while he keeps publicly promising to paint the white house red, he secretly begins painting all its rooms black...

Another Trump cult lie. She wasn't crying.

the result of georgia 6 is a big moral win and a medium-sized win objectively for the GOP. the district was trending towards dems, albeit from a high GOP-leaning level. the final margin of the runoff election fits with the prior assumptions about the district and the political environment nationwide: that democrats are leading the generic house ballot by about 5-6% right now, but would need 7-9% to take back the house in 2018. georgia 6 proves that even throwing unusual amounts of money into a district cant net the dems the much-desired victory they are longing for.

the result of south carolina 5, on the other hand, is a big swing towards dems. that race shouldnt have been nearly as close as it was. this proves that right now, the democratic base is more riled up than the republican base, so that low turnout elections are favorable to dems. but on the other hand, midterm turnout is traditonally higher among GOP-leaning demographics.

so in the end, I personally would consider tonights special election results to be slighlty, but not excessively comforting for republicans and their 2018 house prospects.

She was just sweating from her eyes.