The "oh yeah? (Cricket noises)" might have made my month

https://youtu.be/PQkm4MtGNAQ

More unfounded unproven rumors - will US media provide equal coverage?

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 17 2016 04:05pm

Hiding until third debate? The debates are where the candidates are showcased lol. What does your sentence even mean?

It appears the Clinton campaign paid people to create riots and violence at Donald Trump rallies. It also looks like there was illegal collusion between between Democratic operatives and the Clinton campaign, but that's something we already knew about since the previous leaks from July.

From what I heard they didn't actually create riots and violence, they just acted provocationally and in expected fashion Trump fans became hysterical and violent.

this. lol. not that i'd be surprised either way. and like i said earlier we've seen asshats spitting on people in cuffs and such. Those rallies are a tinder box.

Regardless, the DNC and the Clinton campaign should not have been collaborating at that point in the primaries.

But back to the first point, paying actors (especially mentally ill ones) to act provocative at a rally to try and incite violence seems pretty wrong.

Beating Donald Trump should be pretty easy for Hillary Clinton. At this point, his candidacy is pretty indefensible and he has displayed a complete and utter lack of substantive policy proposals and qualifications for the Oval Office. Why must the Left behave so dishonestly and participate in so much collusion?

We've entered full "tribal" mode at this point in the election, where blatant wrongdoings on the side we're on are immediately dismissed because all that matters is winning the election. I challenge that idea - Clinton is clearly the better option this election, but her campaign and the DNC deserve to be heavily criticized for such behavior and collusion.

As a lifelong moderate voting for Gary Johnson I can say HRC is still the lesser of two evils. When the risk is full on nationalistic trade, foreign policy, and potentially damaging global relations its an easy choice. Its not as if Trump can win out on hawkishness, he's shown he's just as trigger happy but with less foresight.

Even if we considered them equally bad to women, he's still worse as an unknown.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 17 2016 07:18pm

ever consider that the "conspiracy theories" about the polls being rigged might actually be true and they are desperate because internal information tells them they are actually losing?

in 2008 people used yard signs and rally turnout as an indicator that Obama is crushing McCain and now they mean nothing