d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > October Invasion Of Israel
Prev11291301311321331659Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 121749Replies: 16584Track Topic
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1301
Oct 12 2023 05:46pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 12 2023 06:31pm)
Not sure what you mean by "not free from the consequences". So if someone is far right-leaning, it's ok to assault them? Sorry I don't understand what you mean.


It's okay to punch fascists.
Member
Posts: 50,832
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
#1302
Oct 12 2023 05:48pm
Quote (fender @ Oct 12 2023 06:44pm)
boring and lazy. do some reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance


Yeah there's a real paradox when the neoliberals start tolerating both commie terrorists and nazi war criminals at the same time
And then try to say anyone in the center who rejects violent extremism must be violently repressed because muh illogic

This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 12 2023 05:48pm
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#1303
Oct 12 2023 05:48pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 12 2023 04:46pm)
It's okay to punch fascists.


Ok you're just trolling.
Member
Posts: 41,259
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 2,738.71
#1304
Oct 12 2023 05:50pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 12 2023 06:46pm)
Israel has a humanitarian imperative to provide some level of aid to Gaza when its appropriate, which doesn't make any sense at all during a time of open warfare. I suppose they're obligated to provide aid to any Hamas combatants that surrender and are interned as prisoners of war. After the war ends Israel will be in the same position of conflicting humanitarian desire to provide basic services to Gaza and a security necessity to blockade weaponry from them. But as I've pointed out over the past few days, this war likely ends with Gaza surrounded by DMZ minefields and fortifications


Ok

The following is the UN definition

International humanitarian law prohibits collective punishment of prisoners of war or other protected persons for acts committed by individuals during an armed conflict. The imposition of collective punishment is a war crime.

Do you believe your answer above is in contradiction with this definition, or do you believe because there is open warfare that this definition is still, not relevant. Or do you just not agree that this should be a war crime

Member
Posts: 19,257
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,004.95
#1305
Oct 12 2023 06:01pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 12 2023 04:41pm)
"There will be violent consequences for saying whatever you want" is somewhat incongruent with labeling other people fascists


if you promote far-right, violent ideologies in public and your entire shtick is based on inciting people, yeah, you should absolutely watch your back. thats not a threat, thats just common sense
Andy Ngo is a professional right wing troll

This post was edited by gnarjay on Oct 12 2023 06:01pm
Member
Posts: 50,832
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
#1306
Oct 12 2023 06:04pm
Quote (Bazi @ Oct 12 2023 06:50pm)
Ok

The following is the UN definition

International humanitarian law prohibits collective punishment of prisoners of war or other protected persons for acts committed by individuals during an armed conflict. The imposition of collective punishment is a war crime.

Do you believe your answer above is in contradiction with this definition, or do you believe because there is open warfare that this definition is still, not relevant. Or do you just not agree that this should be a war crime


You know through the history of warfare both contemporary and historical theres no concept of one party being somehow obligated to provide resources and services for the unconquered civilian population of their adversary.
Didn't hang any nazis for withholding their supplies of sausage and sauerkraut from folks living in Philadelphia. And America was not delivering aid packages of food, water and gasoline to Hamburg and Dresden. Well, maybe gasoline



This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 12 2023 06:06pm
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
#1307
Oct 12 2023 06:04pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Oct 13 2023 02:01am)
if you promote far-right, violent ideologies in public and your entire shtick is based on inciting people, yeah, you should absolutely watch your back. thats not a threat, thats just common sense
Andy Ngo is a professional right wing troll


and the people deciding what "far-right, violent ideologies" are......are nutjobs like you

clown world
Member
Posts: 41,259
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 2,738.71
#1308
Oct 12 2023 06:07pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 12 2023 07:04pm)
You know through the history of warfare both contemporary and historical theres no concept of one party being somehow obligated to provide resources and services for the unconquered civilian population of their adversary.
Didn't hang any nazis for withholding their supplies of sausage and sauerkraut from folks living in Philadelphia. And America was not delivering aid packages of food, water and gasoline to Hamburg and Dresden. Well, maybe gasoline


Iirc these were mutually agreed upon after the Geneva convention that just followed ww2

Member
Posts: 50,832
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
#1309
Oct 12 2023 06:12pm
Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ Oct 12 2023 07:04pm)
and the people deciding what "far-right, violent ideologies" are......are nutjobs like you

clown world


"everyone I dont like is literal hitler and a war criminal. Except literal nazi war criminals. And also we need to end the jewish question once and for all"

I think they took that line of "...if it weren't for double standards..." as a challenge
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1310
Oct 12 2023 06:20pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 12 2023 06:48pm)
Ok you're just trolling.


Nope.

Punching a nazi is an objectively moral good.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11291301311321331659Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact