6 pages of fenderp acting like a complete retard

was nice and chill here when he got put in timeout for a while. he is making up for “lost time” sadly spamming and flaming all over

rent free xD

Targeting individual political opponents with lies and propaganda like fabricating Russia hoax for example hmm? Yeah that's pretty shitty especially on that level targeting the guy running for president.

Thx for pointing out what sick individuals those so called "Democrats" really are.

1. You have yet to prove that Fox spreads lies and propaganda. Hint: just because you hate Fox, it doesnt mean they lie and propagandize.

2. Deep down you know it's wrong to make Fox take responsibility for what others do. This is why you are having so much difficulty answering my question.

Nobody gives a shit about what you think of Fox. They make you cry, though.

this whole thread is about a demonstrable lie used to propagandise against a judge - try to keep up, buddy. btw, it worked like a charm, the judge received several threats from unhinged fascists believing faux' bs. but hey, keep making excuses for those terrorists...

I don't condone those threats. I am just trying to tell you that Fox should not be held responsible for what their viewers do. You keep having huge trouble understanding this very basic concept.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Aug 14 2022 01:19pm

You cry about Fox all the time, therefore, Fox also lives in your head rent-free.

unfortunately, you don't quite seem have the ability to make a crucial distinction here, so let me try to explain it to you in simple terms you can follow: there is a difference between LEGAL and MORAL accountability.
even the repeated inciting of vigilantism and terrorism will be difficult to prove as the sole motivation for such actions - especially if it's done indirectly, through lies and misrepresentations, which is why faux and other right wing media do it that way. their viewers still get the message though, as proven by the rise of threats and actual acts of terrorism committed.

that does, however NOT mean that any decent person, anyone who is NOT a fascist bootlicker, should try to downplay or even support this kind of despicable propaganda. yet here you are, twisting yourself into a pretzel to defend faux news' stochastic terrorism, their lies and propaganda.

the whole "b-b-but legally they are not responsible for what their unhinged viewers do" narrative is just a dumb pivot, and largely irrelevant to my point. fact is, they intentionally contribute to pushing those people over the edge, and this judge wouldn't be the first one to lose his life over it... imagine making excuses for such practices. disgusting really...

This post was edited by fender on Aug 14 2022 01:29pm