d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Freedom Or Security? Choose One
Prev1121314151621Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1106Replies: 202Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
#131
Oct 1 2021 05:32pm
Quote (SkillRincer @ Oct 1 2021 06:30pm)
lol w/e you say sheep


oh no youve used three buzzwords from facebook now. how many more are you prepared to show next?
Member
Posts: 26,862
Joined: Feb 27 2013
Gold: 4,445.68
#132
Oct 1 2021 05:33pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 1 2021 04:16pm)
So what's stopping people from changing the definition of vaccine to include intramuscular cocaine injections? I mean, the English language is evolving all the time, right?

The exaggerated example given above is to show you that it is very bad to change the definition of something casually. And we all know the reason you are changing the definition is due to political reason, anyway. You are doing it to force covid jabs on us. It has nothing to do with changing science or changing language needs.



I’d assume scientific credentials and the collective agreement of experts in the field
You act like life’s a Wikipedia page that anyone can edit my guy. And if you think it’s to force anything please read the thread where I go in detail on how your rights are A okay :Santa:
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#133
Oct 1 2021 05:34pm
Quote (SkillRincer @ Oct 1 2021 06:26pm)
it wouldnt change the word if they gave a "valid" reason to include intramuscular cocaine injections to fit in the definition
his point still stands if i got it correctly, altering words to fit narratives is destructive to the language


Altering words to fit a narrative is destructive to language. This isn't that though. This is a small clarification when the definition would have already included that technology. She's just using the "destructive to language" talking point to avoid actually looking at the change and assessing it's actual impact.
Member
Posts: 72,480
Joined: Jan 21 2008
Gold: 284,241.70
#134
Oct 1 2021 05:35pm
Quote (iWorshiptheBlahaj @ Oct 1 2021 05:32pm)
oh no youve used three buzzwords from facebook now. how many more are you prepared to show next?


facebook?? wtf lmao

just callin a spade a spade my guy
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
#135
Oct 1 2021 05:38pm
Quote (SkillRincer @ Oct 1 2021 06:35pm)
facebook?? wtf lmao

just callin a spade a spade my guy


yes but as youve clearly demonstrated many times in this thread you are confused as to what point you were trying to make and you are not capable of "calling them as i see them" because you are unable to tell what it is that you see. you have failed here today
Member
Posts: 72,480
Joined: Jan 21 2008
Gold: 284,241.70
#136
Oct 1 2021 05:41pm
Quote (iWorshiptheBlahaj @ Oct 1 2021 05:38pm)
yes but as youve clearly demonstrated many times in this thread you are confused as to what point you were trying to make and you are not capable of "calling them as i see them" because you are unable to tell what it is that you see. you have failed here today


you just said a whole lot of nothing man

what a waste lmao
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#137
Oct 1 2021 05:43pm
Quote (MrSK @ Oct 1 2021 04:33pm)
I’d assume scientific credentials and the collective agreement of experts in the field
You act like life’s a Wikipedia page that anyone can edit my guy. And if you think it’s to force anything please read the thread where I go in detail on how your rights are A okay :Santa:


Are you advocating forcing covid "vaccines" on unwilling individuals, or not? If yes, then their rights are not "A-okay".
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#138
Oct 1 2021 05:44pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 1 2021 04:34pm)
Altering words to fit a narrative is destructive to language. This isn't that though. This is a small clarification when the definition would have already included that technology. She's just using the "destructive to language" talking point to avoid actually looking at the change and assessing it's actual impact.


I never said the words "destructive to language". Stop making shit up about me.
Member
Posts: 26,862
Joined: Feb 27 2013
Gold: 4,445.68
#139
Oct 1 2021 05:44pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 1 2021 04:43pm)
Are you advocating forcing covid "vaccines" on unwilling individuals, or not? If yes, then their rights are not "A-okay".



Like I said read my multiple replies on this thread and if you still need help come to your own conclusion
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#140
Oct 1 2021 05:48pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 1 2021 06:44pm)
I never said the words "destructive to language". Stop making shit up about me.


I never said you did. I put "destructive to language" in quotes for a reason, because it broadly describes the type of argument you are making.

Quote (JessiWan @ Oct 1 2021 06:05pm)
I see that you are unfamiliar with the concept of satire.

Anyway, changing the definition to make it fit is not right. And in fact, the fact that the definition needs to be changed in order for covid jab to be considered vaccine is proof that it's not a real vaccine. If it were, they would not feel the need to update the definition.


When you say it's not right to change the definition to make it fit that's the kind of argument you are making, and you are also incorrect that it was required for the covid jab to be considered a vaccine.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1121314151621Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact