Based.

So basically Iran without the incest and mud huts.

I don't know what the Iranians believe. If they believe that the KJV is the Word of God without error and his laws are perfect then they are off to a good start.

To boil it down: If the terrorist supporting, leftist scum were consistent, then they'd be going after not just Iran, but most of the middle east. They're against any form of Theocratically based rule... Except Islam. "Down with Israel, they're a theocracy!" Okay... So's Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Pakistan, and the list goes on.

There's no consistency here. A church that has never done violence is okay to bomb in a terrorist attack because you disagree what what they preach. Okay? So, a great majority of Mosques preach that gays are animals, and it's mercy to kill them. Is it now okay to bomb all the Mosques? Ofc not, don't you dare harm the poor mooslims!

It's just terrorism supporting double-speak. Nothing more.

I too believe that people lived to be 400 thousands of years ago even though we can barely live to 100 today with modern medicine. How much xanex do you take daily friend?

It is violence when they actually set about doing that. Simply saying "I think the government should round up conspiracy theorists and hang them in FEMA death-camps" is not violence. It's an outrageous idea. If every "outrageous" idea invited summary retribution (i.e. literally firebombing their house) we'd live in a terrible, frightened, intellectually stunted wasteland. To prevent that outcome we need to safeguard the speech of those we are pretty confident are just terrible.

We already have journalists in highly paid and prestigious positions screeching about how publishing the opinions of a sitting US Senator represents "violence" because ???. It's a slippery slope that we're already sliding down.

I never said it should be met with retribution. All I said was that it is violent.

You didn't?

I didn't say it should be bombed.

You justified the bombing, falsely claimed it's not terrorism, and pointed the finger at the victims of the bombing (the church congregation) as at fault.

I'd say, justifying a terrorist attack and blaming the victims of the attack is so close to saying the terrorism "should happen" as to bear no difference.

You're a terrorism supporter. Simple enough.