d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing Week
Prev11213141516443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 91,066
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 7 2018 11:32am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Sep 7 2018 11:27am)
I agree it's unlikely.

I think Kavanaugh's political ties would have raised questions on most nominees in the past. But it's clear the nomination process for lifetime appointees has become increasingly partisan over time. It's a different game now. We don't even have the filibuster anymore.


keep in mind this guy is likely as connected or less connected than 50 or so other USSC judges of the past. Think of how we're getting this info, via emails and old transcripts. in the 50s to recently they just kept the secretary in the hallway and burned or shredded the faxes or letters.

politics have always been this or more dirty, we just had zero access to the proof. give it 20 years or so and maybe the people will finally start to realize they have to be clean, not by choice, but by necessity. one leak can end a career, these guys just dont have that type of knowledge because they're from the typewriter generation. then again, watching our generation stuff their foot in their mouth repeatedly on social media just like the old people has me wondering if humans can and will ever learn.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 7 2018 11:32am
Member
Posts: 104,573
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 7 2018 11:33am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Sep 7 2018 01:12pm)
He testified he wasn't involved in handling Pryor's nomination. That could be technically true. But he also stated he was involved in "important confirmation hearing issues." I think perjury is a fair possibility here.

Perhaps it could be better answered with the release of more documents? I mean, there's a clearer reason now why the GOP hasn't complied with those requests.



This does NOT = involved in the nomination.

Member
Posts: 91,066
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 7 2018 11:37am
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 7 2018 11:33am)
This does NOT = involved in the nomination.


he'd need a clinton-esque "what does is mean" moment to skirt that entirely. in reality he'll walk back that and define what he was and wasnt involved in. the question was broad on purpose and he stepped in it.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 7 2018 02:42pm
https://www.thedailybeast.com/newly-released-emails-show-brett-kavanaugh-may-have-perjured-himself-at-least-four-times?
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 7 2018 02:50pm
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/judge-brett-kavanaugh-should-be-impeached-for-lying-during-his-confirmation-hearings.html

Quote
Kavanaugh should be removed because he was repeatedly asked under oath as part of his 2004 and 2006 confirmation hearings for his position on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit about whether he had received such information from Miranda, and each time he falsely denied it.


Perjury?

isn't Perjury a crime? are crimes okay now?
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 7 2018 03:01pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 4 2018 09:21pm)
What does PaRD think of former Kavanaugh clerk Zina Bash's totally "random" right hand placement?

almost seems too crazy for me to believe there was any intent there. Coincidence probably? Thoughts?


https://twitter.com/The_UnSilent_/status/1038012286433206278

is she just trolling us now?
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 7 2018 03:03pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 7 2018 10:42pm)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/newly-released-emails-show-brett-kavanaugh-may-have-perjured-himself-at-least-four-times?


Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 7 2018 03:05pm
Zina Bash also does security at Trump rallies, wow she's everywhere

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2018/09/07/man-standing-behind-trump-at-montana-campaign-rally-stole-the-show-before-he-was-moved-away/23519826/?

LMFAO
Member
Posts: 61,492
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 5.77
Sep 7 2018 05:20pm
Quote
On February 13, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died.[71] Later that day, Senate Republicans led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a statement that they would not consider any nominee put forth by Obama, and that a Supreme Court nomination should be left to the next President of the United States.[72][73][74] President Obama responded that he intended to "fulfill my constitutional duty to appoint a judge to our highest court,"[75][76] and that there was no "well established tradition" that a president could not fill a Supreme Court vacancy during the U.S. President's last year in office.[77]

On March 4, The New York Times reported that Garland was being vetted by the Obama Administration as a potential nominee. A week later, Garland was named as one of three judges on the President's "short list" (along with Judge Sri Srinivasan, also of the D.C. Circuit, and Judge Paul J. Watford of the Ninth Circuit). Obama interviewed all three leading contenders, as well as two others who were being considered: Judge Jane L. Kelly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.[78]

On March 11, 2016, Senator Orrin Hatch, President pro tempore of the United States Senate and the most senior Republican Senator, predicted that President Obama would "name someone the liberal Democratic base wants" even though he "could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man."[79][80] Five days later, on March 16, Obama formally nominated Garland to the then vacant post of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.[81][82]

In an unprecedented move, Senate Republicans (under Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell) refused to consider Garland's nomination, holding "no hearings, no votes, no action whatsoever" on the nomination.[83][84] The refusal was highly controversial, with some commentators saying the seat on the Court to which Garland was nominated was "stolen".[85][86][87] Over 170,000 people signed a White House petition asking President Obama to independently appoint Garland to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Senate had waived its advise and consent role.[88] On November 17, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras threw out a lawsuit against Senator McConnell seeking to compel a vote on the nomination, finding that the plaintiff, who had simply alleged he was a voter, had no standing to sue.[88]


This was the period of time that the entire GOP started working with Russia on hacking election machines and flipping the election to Trump. That's why they changed their minds. They knew they didn't have to worry about elections anymore because everything is completely rigged now. All you have to do is look at what they did in Georgia; changing votes and then deleting the election records immediately to prevent an audit. They did this in the critical states Trump won. Guarantee it.

Obama should have locked them all up in Gitmo and prevented the 2016 elections. He should have created a state of emergency that allowed him to seize power indefinitely until every Republican was jailed.

Because he didn't, the Republicans are going to.

/reverse QAnon for the day
Member
Posts: 46,664
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Sep 7 2018 05:57pm
apparently one 'protester' pulled out of the hearings was a free bleeder wearing pants soaked with her menstrual blood who made quite the mess and had to be hauled away with her legs in the air
I honestly don't feel like linking that picture, but its out there, just not being reported on
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11213141516443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll