Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 23 Nov 2012 21:02)
I've posted a couple of books that drive at similar points without all of the logical inconsistencies, and I've still read a lot more of your book than you have read of either of the books that I posted. So there's that.
The problem is not being interested in the actual truth. :(
When you call people spammers for disagreeing with you, and when you say their philosophies are wrong, when you call other peoples' belief systems "Nonsense beliefs" without even finding out what their beliefs are... how is that not attacking? Explain to me how calling someone's deeply held philosophical values "Nonsense beliefs" without actually knowing what they believe is not a personal attack.
Obvious spam is spam (read the original post and your posts).
If you do not agree with original post, you can report it (probably already done I guess).
I do not attack you, I'm pointing out facts.
I do not care about spam, it is serving the truth as free bumps anyway.
If YOU take facts as a personal attack, YOU are to blame for that.
Belief IS non-sense, there is nothing to add.
Knowing is the way.
About the book you post, that was only one book, and not talking about the universal truth of life and death, which is the topic of this thread.
I am still waiting for the 999 better explanations you talked about... But I will still not read it if it is off topic.
You can spam more if you want OR you can post constructive things as I asked you in original post and later.
Now I will stop answer to the free bumps, I am sorry I did, but I have some extra time today.
If you want to discuss with me, just pm me, I will ignore the spam again from now on.