like, if, for instance, there is a negotiated deal, which involves 600 trucks being allowed daily in to Israel and that say, on the 15th Oct 2025, only 20 trucks were allowed in to gaza to deliver food? would this report be considered antisemitic and racist speech?

what really gets me is this denial of the use of food as a weapon. they say they will starve gaza, they dont let trucks in but then when people die of starvation we get told its all lies. how does 1+1 = 7?? 1+1=2

This post was edited by ferdia on Oct 15 2025 02:23pm

it boils down to the israeli people and jewish scholars propagandizing their own people. they've outlined a number of historical tropes that have been applied to jews (greed, untrustworthy, etc), and have told people that if israel is criticized with any action that aligns with one of these tropes that the root of the criticism is blood libel, and hate of jewish people, that the very suggestion is antisemitic. and therefore the criticism is invalid, not due to factual or unfactual nature, but because it is fruit of a poisonous tree. so they'll lazily try and counter it if you're lucky, or they'll just discount it, because its been labelled as antisemitic.

look at many names, his entire view of the war is that it is for security, and to preserve human lives.

shooting people on 10-7 doesnt align with that, so its false. starving doesnt make them more safe, so it has to be false. its collective brainwashing just as bad as what hamas does in gaza.

all well otherwise? this topic is so hard.

quite well! i hope its the same with you friend.

My PC died last month, had to buy a new one. and i lost 2-3 in my clan's tour match this evening - vs a druid. erfff.
but i managed to buy some food and hide it away while wifey was out and im just waiting for her to go to bed so i can pig out on it.

lol?

This wouldn’t have happened without the military stikes in Iran and Qatar. I think he should get a big chunk of credit.

Well, they do keep winning these little wars.

Its not like the area has always been peaceful.

I struggle to find any time when Israel initiated the conflict, though.

There is an agreement
Hamas agreed to return the bodies. When a kidnapper buries his victims and then blames the storm for hiding the graves, you don’t call it an accident, you call it a crime. Israel’s demand is not vengeance, it’s the last act of dignity for those stolen lives.

There 100% should be consequences for not fulfilling the agreement.

You don’t negotiate over a body you don’t have. Hamas included the dead hostages in the deal because they knew where those bodies were. You can’t claim to ‘return’ remains and then suddenly say you don’t know where they are. Either they had them, or they lied from the start.


You’re not just biased, you’re racist because you’re hostile to Israelis for responding exactly as your own country would if October 7th had happened to you. hypocrisy built on prejudice - racism

2 hostages whose bodies were returned to Israel today are Inbar Hyman and Mahmoud al-Atrash.