Quote (Handcuffs @ Sep 9 2024 10:32am)
I don't think you're wrong. It is deeply unfortunate that media has lost any sense of public service or accountability, such that they will prioritize the profits of increased ratings/engagement to cover mass shooters in a way that has resulted in a uniquely American phenomenon where mass shooters are thrust into the spotlight, feel like they 'made their mark', and subsequently inspire other mass shooters to follow in their footsteps or get higher kill scores. We've created a fast-track to notoriety and fame, with seemingly no public will to actually address this at-scale.
A great deal of research has been done on this, and you can draw direct lines of inspiration primarily going back to the Columbine shooters, whom themselves were directly inspired by the Oklahoma City Bombing and wanted to out-do that event with their own.
I absolutely agree this is the root cause and impetus behind these attacks, it being rooted in the desire to be recognized, making their mark as you mention.
On the topic of red herrings, another unfortunate reality is that both political sides are incentivized to thrust and disseminate these tragedies on the public - the left wing wants to bring attention to these tragedies and blame the guns, furthering their political ambitions of gun control, while the right wing wants to bring attention to these tragedies and blame the mental health, furthering their political ambitions of a greater religious presence & structure in the public sphere. I agree that both are red herrings which avoid the real issue of social media contagion & the desire for social recognition. These competing incentives form an unholy triad between the political parties & corporate media who all profit, much like a cartel.