Both but the iba is the relevant one in this conversation.

For some reason, you can’t find the match anywhere. Seems like they have something to hide.

Feminism means men can hit women now, that's what conservatives told me.

"Oh you wanna be equal, that means I get to hit you now"

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 4 2024 11:59pm

Well yes but Antifa is 5-10 years ahead in that regard
When was that Vancouver women's shelter attacked by militant trannies on the basis that their "no man shelter to keep women safe" should have to allow transgender rapist cocks
https://x.com/VanRapeRelief/status/1166426534321647616
2019 it looks like

Pretty sure there were some men in dresses attacking women around the 2016-2017 era with unite the right and the election riots, even before the george floyd era.

this has been settled for quite a few days now. the reason there's an "ongoing debate" is because many people are digging their heels in with outdated information.

the only relevant details left to settle are:

1. whether they have XY chromosomes at all, or if that was misinformation
2. why they have elevated testosterone (if they do) because typically XY females have lower not higher T counts

the possibility that this person is a born as male trans athlete are gone, and have been for a while.

We're not the ones triggered by a female boxer fighting and winning against another female boxer.

"RRRRReeeeeEEEEEEEEeeeeee they don't have to wear a bra, they must be a man!!! REEEeeEEE"

"female boxer" who was disqualified from the world championships for failing gender eligibility tests

But hey let "her" compete at the Olympics so lefties can enjoy seeing this thing beating up women

BTW who's going REEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEE here on a daily basis look at all your REEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEE topics that were closed, one after the other, lol

This post was edited by Djunior on Aug 5 2024 08:48pm

I'm a little behind since my warn just got removed today.

This seems straight forward as a person who is firmly on the side of whatever you're born as is what you are.

She was born a woman, she has the natural advantage of high test, or whatever. Shes a genetic freak for her sport. This is no different than any other athlete that's born a genetic freak for their sport. Should we have banned Phelps because he had a genetic advantage that made him better at swimming? No. Some people will be born genetic freaks that lend well to different things, in this case turns out higher natural test lends her better to fighting.

Like Phelps, she can dominate, we let Phelps do it, why is everyone's panties up their butts now?

I dunno, reading the comments here, this one seems pretty straight forward.

This post was edited by SBD on Aug 6 2024 08:17am

Pretty good take.