d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > How Exactly Does Abortion Protect Women's Bodies?
Prev1121314151621Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1595Replies: 200Track Topic
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#131
Jan 12 2024 11:29am
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Jan 12 2024 06:55am)
Yes, absolutely, still in control if the embryo is for about 2 months or 8 weeks inside its mothers belly. An embryo does not have ANY human rights.

The human host (yes, you hate the language I know) is the one who is in control and is the ONE AND ONLY decision maker. Learn that, accept that!

Edit: Two months old is a strange term. I am talking about an embryo here, you apparently dont. A born child cant be aborted. Sad that this needs to be pointed out.


By your logic it is the same situation, just a different physical location. The child still latches on to the “host” and feeds for survival.

To me and countless others it is considered infanticide whether two months in the womb or two months outside of the womb. Hell, two years outside the womb and the child is still 100% dependent on other humans for survival.
Member
Posts: 15,522
Joined: Apr 17 2006
Gold: 13,930.41
#132
Jan 12 2024 11:10pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 12 2024 06:42am)
You word it like the child is a parasite. Posts like this are important for people to see because y’all literally think it is okay to kill people because of financial problems, relationship issues and stress.

What if a child is born into a beautiful happy marriage, and at two months old the father gets into a bad accident losing his legs. This causes financial problems and stress, very likely relationship problems as well. The child is still just a parasite suckling on the mother’s tits right? Is the “host” (absolutely disgusting language by the way) still in control?


No one is offing children after they are born. Turn off Faux News.

It is literally a statistical fact that low income, unplanned children, are the main reason low class becomes even lower. Free abortions would increase the health chances of the mother and literally the financial burden.

BTW 15 RED states have REFUSED to accept FEDERAL funding for free meals to low income families.
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#133
Jan 13 2024 08:41am
Quote (Pyrotechx @ Jan 12 2024 11:10pm)
No one is offing children after they are born. Turn off Faux News.

It is literally a statistical fact that low income, unplanned children, are the main reason low class becomes even lower. Free abortions would increase the health chances of the mother and literally the financial burden.

BTW 15 RED states have REFUSED to accept FEDERAL funding for free meals to low income families.


Yes, we know you have been desperate for attention and want to talk about the fact that the people that already don’t want to give free money away to fat lazy pieces of shit actually disagree with giving those same fat lazy pieces of shit even more money.

Wow.
Member
Posts: 15,522
Joined: Apr 17 2006
Gold: 13,930.41
#134
Jan 15 2024 09:56am
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 13 2024 08:41am)
Yes, we know you have been desperate for attention and want to talk about the fact that the people that already don’t want to give free money away to fat lazy pieces of shit actually disagree with giving those same fat lazy pieces of shit even more money.

Wow.


You mean this fine specimen of health doesn't want to help poor kids? It's $40 a month, I don't think obese people are going to be breaking the bank on this one, but continue to be ignorant. Just don't tell me you follow Jesus or read the bible.

Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#135
Jan 15 2024 11:33am
Quote (Pyrotechx @ Jan 15 2024 09:56am)
You mean this fine specimen of health doesn't want to help poor kids? It's $40 a month, I don't think obese people are going to be breaking the bank on this one, but continue to be ignorant. Just don't tell me you follow Jesus or read the Bible .

https://i.imgur.com/5pr14wj.jpeg


Never once have.


Good for this governor.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#136
Jan 15 2024 11:38am
Quote (Pyrotechx @ Jan 15 2024 09:56am)
You mean this fine specimen of health doesn't want to help poor kids? It's $40 a month, I don't think obese people are going to be breaking the bank on this one, but continue to be ignorant. Just don't tell me you follow Jesus or read the bible.

https://i.imgur.com/5pr14wj.jpeg


Mark 16:20

Thou shalt feed the poores among you for what you do for the poorest among you is what you do for me. Unless some people are overweight and you would accidentally feed them. In that case, feed nobody because fatty deserves it
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#137
Jan 15 2024 11:54am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 15 2024 11:38am)
Mark 16:20

Thou shalt feed the poores among you for what you do for the poorest among you is what you do for me. Unless some people are overweight and you would accidentally feed them. In that case, feed nobody because fatty deserves it


According to the CDC, between 20 and 30 people in America die of starvation each year.


Epidemic.
Member
Posts: 19,228
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
#138
Jan 15 2024 12:45pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 15 2024 09:54am)
According to the CDC, between 20 and 30 people in America die of starvation each year.


Epidemic.


too bad they dont teach juggalo math in colleges, your numbers are way off

Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
#139
Jan 15 2024 01:28pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 12 2024 06:29pm)
By your logic it is the same situation, just a different physical location. The child still latches on to the “host” and feeds for survival.

To me and countless others it is considered infanticide whether two months in the womb or two months outside of the womb. Hell, two years outside the womb and the child is still 100% dependent on other humans for survival.


Its not the same at all. A embryo is not the same as a baby. One is able to feel, think and suffer and the other one is not. Its pretty obvious and pretty simple. Dont be so annoyingly dumb.

This post was edited by Modulok2405 on Jan 15 2024 01:29pm
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#140
Jan 15 2024 02:37pm
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Jan 15 2024 01:28pm)
Its not the same at all. A embryo is not the same as a baby. One is able to feel, think and suffer and the other one is not. Its pretty obvious and pretty simple. Dont be so annoyingly dumb.


Using your logic, this makes perfect sense. But maybe you have undeniable scientific proof that babies in the womb cannot feel pain. Another canundrum of 30 seconds ago this child was in the womb, but now that it isn’t it is a human being. One big push ago we can kill it because it doesn’t feel.

But you are calling me dumb………

Quote (gnarjay @ Jan 15 2024 12:45pm)
too bad they dont teach juggalo math in colleges, your numbers are way off

https://i.imgur.com/8Fkd5sR.png


Malnutrition is not starvation. Hur de fucking dur both of you

This post was edited by YeeHaw on Jan 15 2024 02:37pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1121314151621Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact