Do you accept the narrative provided in that video?

WARNING: This is a trick question, noting the narrative provided here is that the US is within its rights to carry out surveillance operations against Russia, to which the logical response is, that therefore Russia is within its right to stop said surveillance, being currently at war in the region.

But Russia is just dumb, no idea why they say such things as we didnt touch this drone, they must know the US has camera's everywhere.

I do see there is a development re: Nord Stream 2. Not sure how much traction thats going to get (not much I would imagine).

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 16 2023 06:41am

What i do see is a transitioning into a russian bot

is Elon musk also a bot for proposing Ukraine give up some of its land?
are presidents that ask for peace also bots?

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 16 2023 06:51am

Don't response .

Do you take that guy (Meanwhile) serious? Fair question

not saying it didn't happen but didn't USA also say Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, and Russia destroyed NS, etc?
I'd take anything they say with a grain of salt

Where users will debate in good faith, regardless of their position, I give them the time of day. for users that do not debate in good faith, i dont. meanwhile has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to, at times, debate in good faith.

Users like him (couple others as well) do not debate in good faith and Ukraine/Russia topic is full of proof.

When news or sources are posted that he doesn't like, he will call you Ivan or kremlin bot or he just searches for something random to discredit the source and call you a kremlin bot.

You've experienced that yourself and called him out for discrediting sources (by calling the person in question old), he's pulling similar shit non-stop or just completely ignores what was said and responds with something completely different / out of context.

That is called dishonesty, not debating in good faith. The dude is here for one reason, he hates Russia (China as well) and it shows in almost every post he makes here.

This post was edited by Djunior on Mar 16 2023 07:33am

i think when you talk about russia's "right", you mean its "interest". the way you frame it is moscow's position, but it's not international law.

let me try to explain: imagine a bank robbery. it might be in the "interest" of the robbers to kill witnesses, but that doesn't make it their "right". understand the difference?

the critical word is "almost", not "all" or "virtually". Also he posts some good video's, albeit maybe not intentionally.