Quote (Thor123422 @ Mar 30 2017 09:02pm)
So I read through that sociology book and a psychology book they use at Harvard but I'm still having issues getting over 75th percentile on the psych soc MCAT section. If I can get that up to 90th percentile I'll easily be able to get 99th percentile when I take it again in May. Do you have any good sociology reading that will reinforce basic sociology concepts? Doesn't need to be anything advanced, just relevant to what's going on today.
I have to think about it and look around. I'm just now starting to finally read for pleasure again. Grad school really burned me out. I remember by the end I was having a really hard time of things...cognitively....I wasn't sleeping, was experiencing disorganized and racing thoughts, had difficulty focusing, was anxious, wasn't tending to my ADLs properly, depression, anxiety, it was terrible. Academic induced psychosis IMO. I was in my late 30s though, less fluid intelligence and more crystallized intelligence. Your shit is young and fluid still, you will be fine

I'll think about this and look around. I'm not envious. Still though, I could hit the books for another year or two and get an MSN and become a nurse practitioner....they make a decent chunk more than I make.
But anything written by Macionis is going to be good as sociology goes.
If you really want to dive into the more subversive stuff, check out the Strong Programme, which is part of the SSK (Sociology of Scientific Knowledge) movement. This is very serious stuff, so serious they call it Strong Sociology (critical theory) vs. what they viewed as Weak Sociology which viewed things through rosey (structural functionalist IMO) glasses. Even their journals were different, because they would add pictures of the author of the journal writing the journal to remind the readers that they were humans working rather than using huge emblems that convey authority and infallibility. It is really neat stuff. I would have never even learned about it had I not taken a Science, Technology, and Philosophy class.
I know the sociology of food is another thing the big texts tend to ignore but is really important....It is described as:
Quote
Sociology of food is the study of food as it relates to the history, progression, and future development of society. This includes production, consumption, distribution, conflict, medical application, ritual, spiritual, ethical, and cultural applications, environmental and labour issues.
It is amazing the differences of having a rice vs wheat based society can cause in the development of people, such as the tendency for rice growers to work together very closely to create less calories and how individualism was cultivated in the West for example because so many calories could be grow in such a small space.....so effectively that a Malthusian disaster caused a large chunk of Europe to die in plague. Or how monoculturing a crop, like potatoes, can cause a national disaster and crisis, such as in Ireland. How food distribution in the United States is so stratified based on race and class, with outright food deserts in some areas, and other areas where you have three or four grocery stores in the same neighborhood and sometimes parking lot...in our Ridge neighborhood, by Hyde Park (fart in wine glasses and sniff for enjoyment) Meijer and Target share a lot, and behind them is a Kroger megastore....but you can't buy a banana or tomato in Over the Rhine or Avondale. Buses there run every two hours and if you're coming from one of the poor neighbors I mentioned you have to at least ride a bus downtown then catch another across town to get there. That is just a local example...you learn about it and you start to see it everywhere.
One of the big things is the intersection of society and health and Social Determinants of Health. This is healthcare and governing (biopower) becoming more technocratic and authority slipping away from tradition and into knowledge.
Intersectionality is pretty important and what I think the oncoming paradigm is going to be in the social sciences. So far, mostly due to the way universities are structured, knowledge is very fragmented and compartmentalized into little groups and sub groups that almost exist as their own discourses in a vacuum and autonomously, as if they really exist (in the way Greeks thought numbers existed, objectively). This has led to the explosion of identity-based commodities, including identity politics. Because of how divisive things have become the challenge of unifying the body of knowledge we have becomes the only clear way forward, while trying to avoid the old dichotomies that we've ran into in the past. I just hope the hard-core feminists don't ruin it....but if anything can make feminism more productive again it would be intersectionality, because of its emphasis on class and race as well as gender. The idea that privilege is contingent on time/space is pretty revolutionary, because it contradicts a lot of what sociology has put out about privilege in the past. Here is a link to a pretty good guide on Intersectionality that I recommend:
https://www.sfu.ca/iirp/documents/resources/101_Final.pdfI'll think about new and relevant things for ya, I'm just braindead after the day I had today. I pretty much faced a firing squad and really had to fight some people who wanted to act in a really concretely fascist way.
This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 30 2017 08:40pm