d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Mar A Lago Raided By Fbi
Prev1124125126127128233Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 16 2022 04:59pm
Quote (Ghot @ Aug 16 2022 05:28pm)
Yeah, silly me. I think I'll trust the one posted back in 2016, rather than the one that the DNC and Twitter has had 6 years to alter. :/


You can't edit tweets. And imagine thinking that someone could only post a single tweet per day.

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Aug 16 2022 05:00pm
Member
Posts: 20,629
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,453.85
Warn: 10%
Aug 16 2022 04:59pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Aug 16 2022 03:59pm)
You can't edit tweets.


But can Twitter's staff doctor a tweet?
Member
Posts: 8,545
Joined: Oct 4 2021
Gold: 281.64
Aug 16 2022 05:03pm
Quote (Ghot @ 16 Aug 2022 15:38)
No. I'm saying that just because someone posted a Twitter post that SAYS it's from 2016.... means nothing.

The pic I posted... WAS posted on JSP in 2016.




Post #4153, here: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=72969075&f=119&o=4150


Imagine thinking that twitter could be doctored, but not d2jsp. Extremism gone wild.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 16 2022 05:03pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Aug 16 2022 05:59pm)
But can Twitter's staff doctor a tweet?


Occam's Razor. What is more likely? That Twitter edited an HRC tweet retroactively, or that Hillary Clinton made one tweet celebrating Ramadan, and another remembering D-Day?
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 16 2022 05:06pm
Hah. The Ramadan Tweet was made on June 5th. So he was as wrong then as he is now.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/739571492028092416
Member
Posts: 20,629
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,453.85
Warn: 10%
Aug 16 2022 05:18pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Aug 16 2022 04:03pm)
Occam's Razor. What is more likely? That Twitter edited an HRC tweet retroactively, or that Hillary Clinton made one tweet celebrating Ramadan, and another remembering D-Day?


It's not about which scenario is more likely. Its about the fact that people would even entertain the possibility of twitter doing such a thing.

Twitter's stock is slowly sinking.
Member
Posts: 52,242
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Aug 16 2022 05:19pm
Quote (TheOnlyDenny @ 17 Aug 2022 00:49)
Your post I quoted had the terms "crime" (= breaking the law), "norms" and "abstract norms" in it. Apparently referring to three different kinds of rules. Now where's the difference and what is it we're talking about here? Would you state that his supporters don't place importance on crime? Are we talking about potential crimes here?

And then you apparently draw a line between "importance" and "great importance" (which I actually quoted in my post) leaving the distinction to the rest of us.

It was a vague post, that's all I'm saying.


- claiming to think of norms as at least "important" is what nearly everyone does. "great importance" was intended to delineate those who actually prioritize norms in the decision-making and opinion-forming process from those who only pay lip service to it.

- abstract norm violations are those where norms are violated, but without being tied to a crime which actually violates people's moral sentiment.

- of course Trump supporters place importance on crime - but more on the concrete, tangible types of crime rather than process crime.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 16 2022 05:24pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Aug 16 2022 06:18pm)
It's not about which scenario is more likely. Its about the fact that people would even entertain the possibility of twitter doing such a thing.

Twitter's stock is slowly sinking.


Yeah, the fact you entertain the idea is silly. You can argue Tweet content all you want, but URLs don't lie. The number at the end of Twitter's URLs for tweets increase by one with every single tweet, in order, regardless of who posts it. Millions of tweets happen every day. And the number on the HRC Ramadan Tweet from June 5th 2016 is quite a few million lower than the number on her D-Day tweet on June 6th 2016. So the meme was wrong about HRC in 2016, and it's wrong now.
Member
Posts: 26,350
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 8,044.70
Warn: 10%
Aug 16 2022 05:25pm
Member
Posts: 20,629
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,453.85
Warn: 10%
Aug 16 2022 05:26pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Aug 16 2022 04:24pm)
Yeah, the fact you entertain the idea is silly. You can argue Tweet content all you want, but URLs don't lie. The number at the end of Twitter's URLs for tweets increase by one with every single tweet, in order, regardless of who posts it. Millions of tweets happen every day. And the number on the HRC Ramadan Tweet from June 5th 2016 is quite a few million lower than the number on her D-Day tweet on June 6th 2016. So the meme was wrong about HRC in 2016, and it's wrong now.


We don't care if you think we're silly. We are casting doubt on your precious twitter's integrity and there is jack all you can do about it.

:)
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1124125126127128233Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll