Quote (dro94 @ 18 Jul 2018 22:46)
I don't have anything against them personally or wish any ill. The presence of a monarchy inherently propagates the worst beliefs of the old days: the divine right to rule over the peasantry, a higher birth right, autocracy and exploitation of the working class. Even if they don't have any 'power' (which they do in my opinion through influence) or are a net cost to the taxpayer (they are, even after discounting tourism).
We'll only get change once the Queen dies and a less popular monarch takes the throne. The monarchists are mostly 50s+ so some of them will have to die too before we could win a vote on it :^)
britain is still a very stratisfied society, and I think the fact that monarchy is hanging on in britain is the effect of those societal realities and not its cause.
Quote (ampoo @ 18 Jul 2018 23:14)
i think it can be nice to have a monarch around, whose word carries meaning
can be healthy for a democracy overall
see, for example, the way king Juan Carlos defended the still young spanish democracy in the 1981 spanish coup d'etat:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Spanish_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat_attemptQuote
At 1:14 on 24 February, the king interceded on television, in uniform as the Captain General of the Armed Forces (Capitán General de los Ejércitos), the highest Spanish military rank, to position himself against the insurgents, defend the Spanish Constitution and undermine the authority [of the coupists]
the king speaking out against the coupists and defending the constitution and democracy is considered the key move that made the coup falter.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 18 2018 04:19pm