d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > European Union News > What's Up In The Eu.
Prev1124125126127128669Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 18 2018 02:15pm
Quote (dro94 @ Jul 18 2018 02:13pm)
I'm a staunch republican, you don't catch me singing God Save The Queen.


put em all in one of those fruity double decker buses of yours and drive into a low tunnel!

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 18 2018 02:16pm
Member
Posts: 33,699
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jul 18 2018 02:46pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 18 2018 09:15pm)
put em all in one of those fruity double decker buses of yours and drive into a low tunnel!


I don't have anything against them personally or wish any ill. The presence of a monarchy inherently propagates the worst beliefs of the old days: the divine right to rule over the peasantry, a higher birth right, autocracy and exploitation of the working class. Even if they don't have any 'power' (which they do in my opinion through influence) or are a net cost to the taxpayer (they are, even after discounting tourism).

We'll only get change once the Queen dies and a less popular monarch takes the throne. The monarchists are mostly 50s+ so some of them will have to die too before we could win a vote on it :^)
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 18 2018 03:04pm
Quote (dro94 @ Jul 18 2018 02:46pm)
I don't have anything against them personally or wish any ill. The presence of a monarchy inherently propagates the worst beliefs of the old days: the divine right to rule over the peasantry, a higher birth right, autocracy and exploitation of the working class. Even if they don't have any 'power' (which they do in my opinion through influence) or are a net cost to the taxpayer (they are, even after discounting tourism).

We'll only get change once the Queen dies and a less popular monarch takes the throne. The monarchists are mostly 50s+ so some of them will have to die too before we could win a vote on it :^)


I can see influence as an issue for sure, and many of the powers the royalty have are "ceremonial" but powers all the same. Precedent that they dont often get used doesnt make them any less there.

at least you guys effectively hold them for ransom with the crown jewels and crown estate. i wonder tho, if they are eliminated in some future generation does this mean they'll be stripped of both of these? The jewels aren't much of an issue, they'd likely remain in a museum or the tower of london no matter who "owns" them, and are beyond price. but the lands and their incomes are an issue that needs dealing with. in my understanding most of the incomes of the crown estate are basically donated back into the government.
Member
Posts: 33,699
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jul 18 2018 03:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 18 2018 10:04pm)
I can see influence as an issue for sure, and many of the powers the royalty have are "ceremonial" but powers all the same. Precedent that they dont often get used doesnt make them any less there.

at least you guys effectively hold them for ransom with the crown jewels and crown estate. i wonder tho, if they are eliminated in some future generation does this mean they'll be stripped of both of these? The jewels aren't much of an issue, they'd likely remain in a museum or the tower of london no matter who "owns" them, and are beyond price. but the lands and their incomes are an issue that needs dealing with. in my understanding most of the incomes of the crown estate are basically donated back into the government.


We'd have to split their assets, liabilities and equity into what has been funded from the taxpayer and what was funded by themselves. It's unchartered territory, but I would guess the crown jewels would be handed to the government and they keep a portion of their estate.
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Jul 18 2018 03:14pm
Quote (dro94 @ 18 Jul 2018 22:46)
I don't have anything against them personally or wish any ill. The presence of a monarchy inherently propagates the worst beliefs of the old days: the divine right to rule over the peasantry, a higher birth right, autocracy and exploitation of the working class. Even if they don't have any 'power' (which they do in my opinion through influence) or are a net cost to the taxpayer (they are, even after discounting tourism).

We'll only get change once the Queen dies and a less popular monarch takes the throne. The monarchists are mostly 50s+ so some of them will have to die too before we could win a vote on it :^)


from the perspective of a country, where nobility does not exist anymore i think it can be nice to have a monarch around, whose word carries meaning
can be healthy for a democracy overall

god save the queen my friend
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 18 2018 03:19pm
Quote (dro94 @ Jul 18 2018 03:13pm)
We'd have to split their assets, liabilities and equity into what has been funded from the taxpayer and what was funded by themselves. It's unchartered territory, but I would guess the crown jewels would be handed to the government and they keep a portion of their estate.


to me there is no real distinction. all of their "investment" is nothing but 1000 years of unjust tax collection put back into their own pocket to make more money. what did they do but perpetually wage wars, foreign and domestic, with levies they demanded fight for them. uncharted territory indeed, most countries preferred a guillotine to a arbitrator.
Member
Posts: 33,699
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jul 18 2018 03:49pm
Quote (ampoo @ Jul 18 2018 10:14pm)
from the perspective of a country, where nobility does not exist anymore i think it can be nice to have a monarch around, whose word carries meaning
can be healthy for a democracy overall

god save the queen my friend


not a good post my friend!

Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 18 2018 10:19pm)
to me there is no real distinction. all of their "investment" is nothing but 1000 years of unjust tax collection put back into their own pocket to make more money. what did they do but perpetually wage wars, foreign and domestic, with levies they demanded fight for them. uncharted territory indeed, most countries preferred a guillotine to a arbitrator.


Of course, but arbitrate we will
Member
Posts: 52,479
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jul 18 2018 04:18pm
Quote (dro94 @ 18 Jul 2018 22:46)
I don't have anything against them personally or wish any ill. The presence of a monarchy inherently propagates the worst beliefs of the old days: the divine right to rule over the peasantry, a higher birth right, autocracy and exploitation of the working class. Even if they don't have any 'power' (which they do in my opinion through influence) or are a net cost to the taxpayer (they are, even after discounting tourism).

We'll only get change once the Queen dies and a less popular monarch takes the throne. The monarchists are mostly 50s+ so some of them will have to die too before we could win a vote on it :^)


britain is still a very stratisfied society, and I think the fact that monarchy is hanging on in britain is the effect of those societal realities and not its cause.

Quote (ampoo @ 18 Jul 2018 23:14)
i think it can be nice to have a monarch around, whose word carries meaning
can be healthy for a democracy overall


see, for example, the way king Juan Carlos defended the still young spanish democracy in the 1981 spanish coup d'etat:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Spanish_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat_attempt
Quote
At 1:14 on 24 February, the king interceded on television, in uniform as the Captain General of the Armed Forces (Capitán General de los Ejércitos), the highest Spanish military rank, to position himself against the insurgents, defend the Spanish Constitution and undermine the authority [of the coupists]


the king speaking out against the coupists and defending the constitution and democracy is considered the key move that made the coup falter.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 18 2018 04:19pm
Member
Posts: 28,848
Joined: Mar 8 2010
Gold: 2,570.91
Jul 18 2018 04:43pm
I found this interesting:



It's the percentage of people in each country who think their nation is culturally superior to the rest. The Greeks are so proud lol.
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 18 2018 04:45pm
mines like 150%
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1124125126127128669Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll