Quote (Pollster @ 23 Mar 2017 16:59)
The fact that they're struggling to even formally begin this process in the House is truly incredible, it's almost impossible to even put into words what a miserable failure this is in a historical sense. It already is on par with some of the absolute worst openings to any previous administrations in U.S. history.
Getting a bill through the House is by far and away the easy part of this process. So much of their overall strategy relies on the quick passage of that bill and then turning around and ramming it through the Senate in less than a week. They're very upfront about the amount of cognitive dissonance one needs to believe they're on the right track: many of the last-second votes they're adding to their tally are being added under the promise that the bill will necessarily be improved in the Senate, when the party knows full well that their only prayer of passage is to pass it as-is. There's no committee action in the Senate, half of their members haven't even read the bill because they assume it's DOA.
what's more miserable is your failure to accurately predict the democrats and (c)linton's tremendous defeat at the hands of President Trump. don't forgot:
Quote (Pollster @ 18 Jul 2015 12:23)
Clinton would win in an electoral landslide. I know people like to have fun discussing fringe candidates but anyone who would attempt to argue otherwise is clearly clueless regarding national and state politics. Clinton would receive at least 347 EVs, and could theoretically push into the 370s-380s if she was fortunate enough to have 6-8 months of campaigning against Trump as the Republican standard-bearer.
Obligatory: thanks for yet another fucking laugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!