“Peer review is just being told what to think, unlike my process, which involves me making things up or being told what to think by sites named stuff like godiskingatheistssuckkkkk.com.”

I could contest the “data” in those slop sources, but it would be a waste of my time. It would be me sending you a dozen or so peer reviewed studies across multiple disciplines and you going, “nope, that’s just what the establishment wants you to think” and pretending to refute those arguments with a dozen or so articles you found on partisan Christian websites that’ll publish anything for eight clicks and $2.50.

I’ll save us both the time and say that the articles you linked are filled with factual inaccuracies and, at their very best, mischaracterize the arguments they purport to refute.

Even trying to refute evolution as a whole is a sign of someone who doesn’t understand even the cliff notes of the science, because at this point in scholarly debate there are a number of different perspectives on the nature and extent of our evolution.

You even mention Gould, who himself was a believer in Darwinism (as well as a Marxist), and participated in extensive debates with other Darwinists with different beliefs. Gould himself published a great number of peer reviewed studies and essays. His theories on unifying scientific and religious discourse might also be interesting to you. Spoiler: he doesn’t hold the opinion that atheists are “sleazy.”

Holding an anti-evolution stance is already difficult. Don’t make it harder on yourself by refusing to engage with modern research. I’d even accept an actual argument against Darwin, but you’ll need to make it without citing garbage Christian blogs clearly intended to fuel fruitless “god vs science” debates.

Meanwhile, humans can't survive in the elements without clothing and protection.
They will die from simple exposure and die rather quickly.
How is that evolution?
Shouldn't we have evolved to the point of at lest preventing that in the last how ever many millions of years?

What kind of argument is that?

“How come snakes die if you expose them to fire? After millions of years, shouldn’t they be immune to fire by now?”

Also, we *have* evolved to prevent that. We developed brains large enough to rationalize that being naked in -50 degree weather is bad. We’ve developed social abilities to move in groups to quickly communicate and establish structures and procure sources of warmth.

Your logic is infinitely recursive. If we accept the structure of your argument, no evolution can ever be true until the being examined is immune to everything and immortal. This is because, in a world where humans had become immune to the cold, you’d apply the same argument to fire, or to aging, or to the need to eat.

Disproving evolution requires engaging with the science and the scientific method. You can’t get there by tossing out half-baked hypotheticals that even a stoned teenager would see are flawed.

No need for crazy extremes like fire or -50 temp.
You will die in nice normal weather, just from the exposure to.
Go outside in the sun for a couple days in nice weather if dont believe me.
Death from normal weather, but we totally evolved here.

didnt say he did. that was my assessment - 'atheists btw, specifically those involved in the scientific process
you posted a lot of complaining
LMK when you want to challenge anything i post

This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 11 2026 07:33pm

Yes they can. It's only when the temperatures becomes too extreme that shelter and clothing are required. No animal can tolerate extremes although there are some better than others.
Or is your argument people need to have full immunity to cold and heat before you accept evolution?

We have evolved to survive in extreme conditions but not by growing fur or gills lmao. We evolved by adapting to the the environment and being smarter.

Did you actually use Wikipedia as a reference? Fun fact, if you write an assignment and you use Wikipedia as a reference you get a fail.

How is that dodging going for you?

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=682922789#p682922789
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=683132051#p683132051
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=683524870#p683524870

So, where does it come from?

Nope, you will die from simple exposure to the sun, even in nice normal weather and it happens in a short amount of time.
No extreme temp or weather needed at all.

Now I'm just genuinely curious...

Do you believe that if you walked outside and sat there while eating food and drinking water for a couple of days you'd instantly just die?