Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 10 2023 02:31pm)
Lets have a thought experiment
Say I've got a wacko neighbor who thinks I'm sapping his life force with my presence, and declares that if he sees me canoeing past his dock he'll get in his speedboat and run me down and make sure I drown. So I get in my canoe, pass by his dock, and as he speeds towards me I pop up with a crossbow and pound a few bolts in his chest as his whispers 'noob cannon...' and dies. I'll say that I had a right to be in the lake, and in my canoe I couldn't escape, so my only choice was to fight back. At the trial where I get convicted and sentenced to decades in prison, the prosecutor will explain how I knowingly created the circumstances that would lead to the violent encounter that wouldn't exist but for my proactive decision, and thus I cannot claim self defense. And how any threats I had received were not imminent and proximate, with plenty of time for me to contact police who could have charged him with menacing, the lawful and proper means to serve justice.
Well the police have a right to serve warrants and you have to let them in. Doesn't change the fact that this guy posed no imminent danger while inside his home, and the police knowingly created the dangerous circumstances that killed him, instead of taking the appropriate caution that should be used when the only reason someone would go down shooting is if you come at them.
And all this plays against the backdrop that the dark brandon government is using night time gestapo raids against its political opponents for no basis but their political activity. If Navarro slept with a Roscoe under his pillow maybe he'd be the first economist murdered by the neoliberals. Well, in America, after Ayman Hadhoud tripped on a hammer.
You dont have to get in your canoe, even though legally u can.
people who threaten the life of the president should be arrested. but here you are pretending you'd have been far happier if the govt spent a few hundred k making a barricade around this dudes house and waiting him out for a few weeks before he finally runs out of food and water and is forced to surrender.
you can try to frame this however you want, thus guy committed suicide by FBI. he threatened the POTUS, refused to avail the concerns of the FBI once contacted in person and RATHER threatened the FBI too. then the FBI, who is obligated to arrest the man who threatened them and hte president, choose the lesser path of resistance in an attempt to MAYBE take a self described armed and violent man alive, and you frame it like it was an assassination.
extreme levels of hate the FBI cope, top to bottom. luckily most people who hate the FBI to the level as you where they mischaracterize everything they say and do are smart enough not to threaten to shoot them. this idiot wasnt, not he's a sack of cold meat. good riddance.