d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev11201211221231245001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 918001Replies: 50000Track Topic
Member
Posts: 26,653
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Gold: 0.00
#1211
Oct 2 2014 02:38pm
some of the philosophy ones are funny but i just dont get most of it
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1212
Oct 10 2014 04:27am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#1213
Oct 11 2014 06:50am
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
#1214
Oct 11 2014 06:54am
Quote (IceMage @ 11 Oct 2014 12:50)
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1398/98/1398988787119.jpg


I have never actually heard someone use the term 'cisgender' as an insult. Never.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#1215
Oct 11 2014 06:55am
Quote (Scaly @ Oct 11 2014 07:54am)
I have never actually heard someone use the term 'cisgender' as an insult. Never.


Me either, because I avoid people like you.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
#1216
Oct 11 2014 06:57am
Quote (IceMage @ 11 Oct 2014 12:55)
Me either, because I avoid people like you.


?

I don't discriminate against straight people... I think the whole 'cis scum' thing was pretty awful and the guy on the right in your pic is a damned embarrassment unless he's playing a part in a pantomime.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
#1217
Oct 11 2014 07:52am
Member
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 68.99
Warn: 10%
#1218
Oct 11 2014 06:54pm
Quote (IceMage @ Oct 1 2014 10:23pm)
I always enjoy some binge watching.  I finished The Sopranos in a couple weeks

the Sopranos and Oz rule, didn't really fancy the Wire as much as i fancied them.
tho Oz got weaker after season 4-5 or so, and the Sopranos couldn't really beat how great the first seasons were

i wish they'd filmed more of Rome.


one view of the capital and it's general propositions, imo it needs a stronger focus on some parts. a bit of a "Soviet view" perhaps? needs more humanism / ideology.
i don't that much like it as a whole representation of Marx's ideas.

feel free to pm me aout Althusserian ideas if anyone's checked into them, as they're next on my reading list.


a rough sketch of Hegel's science of being from "The Logic of Science" according to some people, useful from everything from Leftist Hegelians (Feurbach, Engels, Marx, their associates and somewhat Striner (a hang-around?)) to more modern interpretations (Heidegger, somewhat Derrida via Heidegger and 100% Sartre via Heidegger) to most modern continental philosophy (Badiou, Zizek). the Logic of science is very hard to interpret by anyone at all though, so the sketch might be wrong altogether.
Very, very useful with Badiou and the Event imo. one can't really escape Hegel - whether it's from Kierkegaard's and Schopenhauer-Nietzsche's rejection, to Heidegger's synthesising to Deleuzan opposition of him.
or Zizek's Lacanian reading of him (i really don't like Zizek...) with Badiou's view.

This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 11 2014 07:24pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#1219
Oct 11 2014 08:21pm
Quote (Gastly @ Oct 11 2014 07:54pm)
the Sopranos and Oz rule, didn't really fancy the Wire as much as i fancied them.
tho Oz got weaker after season 4-5 or so, and the Sopranos couldn't really beat how great the first seasons were

i wish they'd filmed more of Rome.

http://www.upload.ee/image/4303776/Capital_1.jpg
one view of the capital and it's general propositions, imo it needs a stronger focus on some parts. a bit of a "Soviet view" perhaps? needs more humanism / ideology.
i don't that much like it as a whole representation of Marx's ideas.

feel free to pm me aout Althusserian ideas if anyone's checked into them, as they're next on my reading list.

http://www.upload.ee/image/4303777/Hegel_s_science.jpg
a rough sketch of Hegel's science of being from "The Logic of Science" according to some people, useful from everything from Leftist Hegelians (Feurbach, Engels, Marx, their associates and somewhat Striner (a hang-around?)) to more modern interpretations (Heidegger, somewhat Derrida via Heidegger and 100% Sartre via Heidegger) to most modern continental philosophy (Badiou, Zizek). the Logic of science is very hard to interpret by anyone at all though, so the sketch might be wrong altogether.
Very, very useful with Badiou and the Event imo. one can't really escape Hegel - whether it's from Kierkegaard's and Schopenhauer-Nietzsche's rejection, to Heidegger's synthesising to Deleuzan opposition of him.
or Zizek's Lacanian reading of him (i really don't like Zizek...) with Badiou's view.


Why don't you like Zizek?
Member
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 68.99
Warn: 10%
#1220
Oct 11 2014 08:41pm
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 12 2014 05:21am)
Why don't you like Zizek?

he's pretty good for popularising his views and he's pretty good at putting them out, but i generally dislike Lacan. this far i've not liked / understood him that well at all.
i need to get more into the Sublime Object of Ideology, but i don't expect that much.

comparing to him... even though i don't fully understand Deleuzian views, his understanding of... "Nietzschean-Spinozean"-views are still great imo - whether it be from our consciousness to our understanding of the society. Deleuze really was a prophet, as things like the Internet are imo best understood via concepts such as the "corpse without organs".
perhaps i'll like Zizek more if i'll appreciate Lacan more. more than Zizek i'm into Heidegger (and his influences), Deleuze, Marx and Kierkegaard. a fucked up combination :D

i'm really trying to get into Freud-Lacan though, but this far it's been.. meh.
Freud without Lacan rules at his own field thugh ;)

check out Negri's "the Empire" btw if you like Marxian analysis.

This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 11 2014 09:02pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11201211221231245001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact