LOL

he gave georgia to (C)linton and took kansas away from Trump using this logic. ga @ 3:10, ks @ 4:20

He said nothing of the sort.

Clinton was up 7 points in Georgia in polls so he stated there's a chance she could win given that information.

Trump's margin in the polls in Kansas was much smaller than historically expected for the red state so he stated there he could potentially be vulnerable to lose Kansas.

Both of these statements are just objective facts.

That you're seeing bias in this is a concern IMO. Stating facts is not bias.

Facts.

polls, the meat in the fake news sandwich, used by the alphabet media to drive a message home that (C)linton would win states like ga, tx, and ks would be a toss-up.
the clown in this video had indiana going to (C)linton

(C)linton lost in a landslide, pollster committed suicide. Good riddance I say! xD

The polls weren't fake lol, they were just missing information.

Clinton really was the favorite to win multiple states she lost with the information that was available. Forecasting algorithms are imperfect.

Clinton really was the favorite to win the election.

I love how people seem to think they were wrong, as if they guaranteed a Clinton victory, despite Trump being at ~30% in the polls

It's really sad how real news is called fake news and fake news called real news nowadays. Trump, Facebook, Twitter, Fox News, and so on have really brainwashed people into the highest level of ignorance I've ever seen.

Again, nothing in the video was fake, biased, or anything of the sort except in your liberal-hating mind. Predicting states with reliable Clinton-favored polls to likely go to Clinton is not bias, it's rational thinking. Imagining hypothetical situations in which one or the other candidate wins certain states and what it means for the race is not bias, it's rational thinking. Of course that's a concept most people nowadays are unfamiliar with.



Not relevant.

Not an argument.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jan 2 2017 01:35pm

great post my friend!

i dont "hate liberals" - 'polls' constructed with missing information as you put it and then utilized in a manner to influence opinion rather than reflect opinion is bothersome.

you know, making it out to be that tx, ga, az were battleground states and pa, mi, oh, fla, nc, mi were all going to be (C)linton +3 to +15 (so much so that the idiot "smartest woman ever" didnt bother going to min until nov 7 and never went to wi)

im glad the alphabet media did this - not because i agree with it, but due to the fact they are all so deluded, out of touch, and stuck in their ways it actually worked to Pres-elect Trump's advantage.

but yes having (C)linton taking states like in and ga isn't 'fake news' - it may be derived from lunatic polls but at least it they were not fake!!!

LOL