d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Iran War Soon?
Prev1119120121122123142Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 9 2026 03:32pm
Low quality bait.

People have been fearmongering a draft for decades.


There was a Vietnam draft

If a draft in Canada happens in my age range the time will come to get a big ol' black sun tattoo
Member
Posts: 17,970
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 9 2026 08:23pm
You already said prior you don't require anyone else's moral authority. Now it suddenly matters to you?

Of course I don't want a member of PaRD crouched in a bomb shelter. I actually PM you ask if you were okay, you know that bullshit.

A nation doesn't have to genocide another population to defend itself.


There is no Genocide its simply propaganda, if you repeat it thousands of times it wont make it true.

I appreciate your concern, really.

This post was edited by Many_Names on Apr 9 2026 08:23pm
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Apr 9 2026 09:31pm
There is no Genocide its simply propaganda, if you repeat it thousands of times it wont make it true.

I appreciate your concern, really.


If you repeat a thousand of times, Pard will soon be saying there is No Genocide in Gaza. similar to There is no war in Ba Sing Se. :P

I am not sure if your Jedi Mind tricks are going to work with some of our friendly Pardians. :lol:

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Apr 9 2026 09:31pm
Member
Posts: 4,157
Joined: Dec 22 2004
Gold: 1,217.00
Apr 9 2026 10:40pm
You're trying to compare a country that actually arrests its own soldiers when they break the law to a regime that gives medals to its proxies for slaughtering civilians. The fact that you know about the 'rape' case or the 'fringe ministers' is because Israel has a free press, an independent judiciary, and a public that demands accountability. Where is the Iranian investigation into the thousands of rockets fired at schools? Where is the 'Hague' for the IRGC leaders who bankroll global terror?

You say I’m complicit? I’m a citizen in a country fighting for its life against a 'Ring of Fire' that you’re busy defending as 'logically consistent.' You’re hyper-focused on 'Amalek' quotes while ignoring the 45-year reality of Iran’s actual expansionism. You can’t have it both ways: you can't claim to care about international law while justifying the unprovoked attacks of October 8th.

If you think a democracy’s internal failures make it the same as a totalitarian death cult, you’ve lost your moral compass entirely. Israel isn't a 'legacy of injustice' it's the only place in the Middle East where you could even have this debate without being dragged into a black site. You’re not fighting for justice; you’re just a spectator cheering for the side that wants to burn it all down."

Good night


You're completely and utterly stuck on your invalid argument that israel is somehow absolved of its crimes because the guys israel bomb the shit out of is also bad guys. That makes no sense. My comparisons are just to highlight and make clear that the atrocities committed are now at such a level you can draw a direct line between present day israel and nazi fucking germany and if you cannot see how shit people think a nation is that keep suchs people in power when leading members of said nation is calling for extinction of another race then you have some serious issues.
And btw you can judge the action of a country simply by looking at the action the country has taken. Ie i don't have to sit and condemn 8 other countries first before i get to the atrocities of one nation; israel.
And again. I never justified oct7 or oct8. That's you looking at the world through black and white lenses only. I don't accept attacks on civilians. Ever. Period. What i wrote earlier was that Israel had a large part of the blame in the 7oct attacks that's not the same as to say I support it or wanted it to happen.

If the democracy brings about a totalitarian regime that brings about death and mayham then you need to abolish the regime. Why would you let it continuing causing grief and destruction?
I'm having this debate from the middle east, you know that i'm in UAE so i don't know what you're on about with black sites and this nonsense and i'm not cheering for Iran either it's not black and white. What i have said in this debate is when you just go about regime change without any plans except for the purpose of causing instability and chaos then what takes power after, is typically just people with guns that will have to do far worse things to keep power than the devil you already dealt with and if this is the case and civil war breaks out and millions of millions of poor iranians die because of it then it's also because of Israel and their fucked up actions.

good morning.
Member
Posts: 17,970
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 10 2026 12:01am
You're completely and utterly stuck on your invalid argument that israel is somehow absolved of its crimes because the guys israel bomb the shit out of is also bad guys. That makes no sense. My comparisons are just to highlight and make clear that the atrocities committed are now at such a level you can draw a direct line between present day israel and nazi fucking germany and if you cannot see how shit people think a nation is that keep suchs people in power when leading members of said nation is calling for extinction of another race then you have some serious issues.
And btw you can judge the action of a country simply by looking at the action the country has taken. Ie i don't have to sit and condemn 8 other countries first before i get to the atrocities of one nation; israel.
And again. I never justified oct7 or oct8. That's you looking at the world through black and white lenses only. I don't accept attacks on civilians. Ever. Period. What i wrote earlier was that Israel had a large part of the blame in the 7oct attacks that's not the same as to say I support it or wanted it to happen.

If the democracy brings about a totalitarian regime that brings about death and mayham then you need to abolish the regime. Why would you let it continuing causing grief and destruction?
I'm having this debate from the middle east, you know that i'm in UAE so i don't know what you're on about with black sites and this nonsense and i'm not cheering for Iran either it's not black and white. What i have said in this debate is when you just go about regime change without any plans except for the purpose of causing instability and chaos then what takes power after, is typically just people with guns that will have to do far worse things to keep power than the devil you already dealt with and if this is the case and civil war breaks out and millions of millions of poor iranians die because of it then it's also because of Israel and their fucked up actions.

good morning.


The irony of you lecturing me about Nazi parallels while writing from the UAE a country that doesn't exactly have a 'free press' or a 'right to protest' is staggering. You’re comfortable calling Israel a 'demonic regime,' yet you wouldn't dare use that same language to describe the government hosting you. That is the definition of a black-and-white lens: you enjoy the safety of a stable region while defending the 'stability' of a genocidal theocracy in Tehran.

You say you don't have to condemn other countries first, but when you ignore 45 years of Iranian state-sponsored terror to focus solely on Israel’s response, you aren't being 'objective' you're just picking a side


You claim you don't justify October 7th, but then you say it was Israel's 'fault.' That is the ultimate victim-blaming. If a regime spends decades funding a 'Ring of Fire' to destroy its neighbor, the 'instability' that follows is on the arsonist, not the person trying to put out the fire

Your 'devil you know' argument is just a fancy way of saying you're okay with Iranian expansionism as long as it doesn't spill over into your comfortable life in the UAE. You’re worried about a hypothetical civil war in Iran, but you’re perfectly fine with the actual, current wars Iran is fueling in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Gaza. You don't have a moral compass; you have a selfish 'not in my backyard' policy. If you think the status quo of a nuclear-hungry theocracy is 'peace,' then you’re not fighting for justice you’re just fighting for a quiet seat while the world burns.

It’s also bizarre that you’re defending the 'stability' of the Iranian regime while sitting in a country that has literally been targeted by their drones. You’re arguing to keep the 'devil you know' in power, yet that same devil’s proxies have fired missiles at the very city you’re living in

Furthermore If the UAE had followed your logic of 'not causing instability,' they never would have signed the Abraham Accords or built a coalition to counter Iranian expansion

you can't do business with someone trying to kill you!

Good morning to you too, In heard some of the gulf states had “peaceful night”

This post was edited by Many_Names on Apr 10 2026 12:05am
Member
Posts: 4,157
Joined: Dec 22 2004
Gold: 1,217.00
Apr 10 2026 12:26am
The irony of you lecturing me about Nazi parallels while writing from the UAE a country that doesn't exactly have a 'free press' or a 'right to protest' is staggering. You’re comfortable calling Israel a 'demonic regime,' yet you wouldn't dare use that same language to describe the government hosting you. That is the definition of a black-and-white lens: you enjoy the safety of a stable region while defending the 'stability' of a genocidal theocracy in Tehran.

You say you don't have to condemn other countries first, but when you ignore 45 years of Iranian state-sponsored terror to focus solely on Israel’s response, you aren't being 'objective' you're just picking a side


You claim you don't justify October 7th, but then you say it was Israel's 'fault.' That is the ultimate victim-blaming. If a regime spends decades funding a 'Ring of Fire' to destroy its neighbor, the 'instability' that follows is on the arsonist, not the person trying to put out the fire

Your 'devil you know' argument is just a fancy way of saying you're okay with Iranian expansionism as long as it doesn't spill over into your comfortable life in the UAE. You’re worried about a hypothetical civil war in Iran, but you’re perfectly fine with the actual, current wars Iran is fueling in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Gaza. You don't have a moral compass; you have a selfish 'not in my backyard' policy. If you think the status quo of a nuclear-hungry theocracy is 'peace,' then you’re not fighting for justice you’re just fighting for a quiet seat while the world burns.

It’s also bizarre that you’re defending the 'stability' of the Iranian regime while sitting in a country that has literally been targeted by their drones. You’re arguing to keep the 'devil you know' in power, yet that same devil’s proxies have fired missiles at the very city you’re living in

Furthermore If the UAE had followed your logic of 'not causing instability,' they never would have signed the Abraham Accords or built a coalition to counter Iranian expansion

you can't do business with someone trying to kill you!

Good morning to you too, In heard some one the gulf states had “peaceful night”


What utter nonsense seriously mate. I cannot have an opinion about alcohol in saudi arabia because it's illegal there? I cannot have an opinion about heroin in Denmark because it's illegal there. Makes absolutely no sense. I'm not claiming UAE to be some sort of utopia, no place is. But i for sure can claim, and with plenty of documentation, that your current demonic regime is responsible for the unnecessary death of more than 20,000 kids. And that's fucked up.

It's kinda victim blaming i suppose. But i don't see you denying or arguing why it was necessary to sponsor, with cash, a known terror organization. Because that's what your government did for years. There's a reason why the US and Europe have made OFAC and sanctions against terror organizations so you do not fund them so they are not able to make atrocities, i wonder why israel didn't follow this example.
there you go again pointing fingers at others but i'm not ignoring 45 years of Iran sponsoring anything let alone terrorist. I'm saying that it's no excuse for israel to commit a genocide and illegally occupy a place for the better part of half a century with the death and displacement of more than 2 mio people..... That's on israel not anybody else
And i'm still not defending Iran but you think i am because i'm against a regime change that might cost millions their lives is baffling to me.
But if you want to talk about stability in my backyard there was stability before israel started bombing iran. Now there's not. Israel did that for themselves not for anybody else. And the missiles and drones that followed was a consequence of Israel and US illegal actions during peaceful negotiations which has now killed any chance of real diplomacy.
I'm a supporter of the abraham accords but they only work if the respective countries stay in their lane and don't commit atrocities and take over more and more land - i think only israel has increased their terrority while being a signatory of the accords right? Is that also Hamas fault or Irans fault that Israeli settlers are murdering families in the west bank?

Member
Posts: 17,970
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 10 2026 12:58am
What utter nonsense seriously mate. I cannot have an opinion about alcohol in saudi arabia because it's illegal there? I cannot have an opinion about heroin in Denmark because it's illegal there. Makes absolutely no sense. I'm not claiming UAE to be some sort of utopia, no place is. But i for sure can claim, and with plenty of documentation, that your current demonic regime is responsible for the unnecessary death of more than 20,000 kids. And that's fucked up.

It's kinda victim blaming i suppose. But i don't see you denying or arguing why it was necessary to sponsor, with cash, a known terror organization. Because that's what your government did for years. There's a reason why the US and Europe have made OFAC and sanctions against terror organizations so you do not fund them so they are not able to make atrocities, i wonder why israel didn't follow this example.
there you go again pointing fingers at others but i'm not ignoring 45 years of Iran sponsoring anything let alone terrorist. I'm saying that it's no excuse for israel to commit a genocide and illegally occupy a place for the better part of half a century with the death and displacement of more than 2 mio people..... That's on israel not anybody else
And i'm still not defending Iran but you think i am because i'm against a regime change that might cost millions their lives is baffling to me.
But if you want to talk about stability in my backyard there was stability before israel started bombing iran. Now there's not. Israel did that for themselves not for anybody else. And the missiles and drones that followed was a consequence of Israel and US illegal actions during peaceful negotiations which has now killed any chance of real diplomacy.
I'm a supporter of the abraham accords but they only work if the respective countries stay in their lane and don't commit atrocities and take over more and more land - i think only israel has increased their terrority while being a signatory of the accords right? Is that also Hamas fault or Irans fault that Israeli settlers are murdering families in the west bank?


You keep bringing up the 'funding' of Hamas as if it’s a smoking gun, but you’re actually proving my original point about appeasement. Israel tried to buy quiet through Qatari cash a disastrous, Chamberlain-style mistake that assumed a 'devil' could be managed. It failed. But for you to say that trying to manage a neighbor makes the victim responsible for their own massacre is the height of moral rot. If you really care about OFAC and sanctions, why are you arguing for a 'bargain' with the world's largest state sponsor of terror in Tehran?

You say you support the Abraham Accords, but you clearly don't understand them. The Accords weren't a 'stay in your lane' agreement; they were a strategic alliance built precisely because the UAE and Israel realized that Iran is the arsonist of the Middle East. There was no 'stability' before Israel hit Iran there was a 45-year expansionist campaign that swallowed Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. If you think diplomacy was 'killed' by Israel, you’re ignoring that Iran’s 'diplomacy' is just a mask they wear while their proxies sharpen their knives.

Finally, your attempt to compare the West Bank settlements to the regional 'Ring of Fire' created by Iran is a total false equivalence. One is a complex, decades-old territorial dispute; the other is a theocratic regime’s literal plan for your and my liquidation. You’re sitting in the UAE enjoying the protection of an alliance you’re busy vilifying. If you truly think Iran's missiles are a 'consequence of Israel' rather than the nature of the Iranian regime, then you aren't a supporter of the Abraham Accords you’re just someone benefiting from a peace you don't have the courage to defend.

Member
Posts: 4,157
Joined: Dec 22 2004
Gold: 1,217.00
Apr 10 2026 01:46am
You keep bringing up the 'funding' of Hamas as if it’s a smoking gun, but you’re actually proving my original point about appeasement. Israel tried to buy quiet through Qatari cash a disastrous, Chamberlain-style mistake that assumed a 'devil' could be managed. It failed. But for you to say that trying to manage a neighbor makes the victim responsible for their own massacre is the height of moral rot. If you really care about OFAC and sanctions, why are you arguing for a 'bargain' with the world's largest state sponsor of terror in Tehran?

You say you support the Abraham Accords, but you clearly don't understand them. The Accords weren't a 'stay in your lane' agreement; they were a strategic alliance built precisely because the UAE and Israel realized that Iran is the arsonist of the Middle East. There was no 'stability' before Israel hit Iran there was a 45-year expansionist campaign that swallowed Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. If you think diplomacy was 'killed' by Israel, you’re ignoring that Iran’s 'diplomacy' is just a mask they wear while their proxies sharpen their knives.

Finally, your attempt to compare the West Bank settlements to the regional 'Ring of Fire' created by Iran is a total false equivalence. One is a complex, decades-old territorial dispute; the other is a theocratic regime’s literal plan for your and my liquidation. You’re sitting in the UAE enjoying the protection of an alliance you’re busy vilifying. If you truly think Iran's missiles are a 'consequence of Israel' rather than the nature of the Iranian regime, then you aren't a supporter of the Abraham Accords you’re just someone benefiting from a peace you don't have the courage to defend.


The reason netanyahu funded hamas, well knowing it could blow up in his face, was for the sole reason of keeping the two state solution off the table. That he has admitted on camera. So it was nothing like appeasement. So if you volountarily sponsor a terror organization and they use those funds to hurt you, i would say you're part of the problem. You can call it victim blaming or whatever else word you like, but it's the truth.
Sanctions and OFAC i never said i cared or was a fan but it perfectly illustates that israel went in dubious ways to sponsor hamas because they personally circumvented the very sanctions that was put against hamas. Typically however they only do harm to the civilian population where Iran and Syria being probably the best examples of it.

Diplomacy WAS killed by israel they bombed iran during negotiatons TWICE. If Israel wants peace it must first show that it really means it. Their cruel behavior in west bank, syria, gaza, lebanon that's fuled by the current governments need to expand the territory is basic proof of same.
When Iran and the rest of the middle east see how israel is treating the palestinians they are daily reminded of the injustice that prevails in israeli apartheid society and therefor, as long as israel continues on it's present course there will always be those who would violently oppose tyranni. That's just the reality.
So unless israel changes its course of action and as an example let the palestinians have a country of their own, with freedoms of their own there is hardly a chance for peace.

West Bank is not a complex territorial dispute it's in clear violation of all international law and it's nothing short of thievery and murder. Do better.
Member
Posts: 17,970
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 10 2026 02:39am
The reason netanyahu funded hamas, well knowing it could blow up in his face, was for the sole reason of keeping the two state solution off the table. That he has admitted on camera. So it was nothing like appeasement. So if you volountarily sponsor a terror organization and they use those funds to hurt you, i would say you're part of the problem. You can call it victim blaming or whatever else word you like, but it's the truth.
Sanctions and OFAC i never said i cared or was a fan but it perfectly illustates that israel went in dubious ways to sponsor hamas because they personally circumvented the very sanctions that was put against hamas. Typically however they only do harm to the civilian population where Iran and Syria being probably the best examples of it.

Diplomacy WAS killed by israel they bombed iran during negotiatons TWICE. If Israel wants peace it must first show that it really means it. Their cruel behavior in west bank, syria, gaza, lebanon that's fuled by the current governments need to expand the territory is basic proof of same.
When Iran and the rest of the middle east see how israel is treating the palestinians they are daily reminded of the injustice that prevails in israeli apartheid society and therefor, as long as israel continues on it's present course there will always be those who would violently oppose tyranni. That's just the reality.
So unless israel changes its course of action and as an example let the palestinians have a country of their own, with freedoms of their own there is hardly a chance for peace.

West Bank is not a complex territorial dispute it's in clear violation of all international law and it's nothing short of thievery and murder. Do better.


You're trapped in a circular argument. You claim Netanyahu 'funded' Hamas to stop a two-state solution, yet you ignore that Hamas’s entire reason for existing long before any funding is the total destruction of Israel. Whether it was a failed attempt at 'management' or a cynical political move, it doesn't change the fact that Hamas pulled the trigger. Blaming the victim for the attacker's agency isn't 'truth,' it’s a moral bypass.

Your talk of 'diplomacy' is a fantasy. You don't negotiate with a regime that hangs its own people and uses Lebanon, Yemen, and Gaza as human shields. Iran didn't attack Israel because of 'settlers'; they’ve been calling for our destruction since 1979, long before the current government existed. You're living in the UAE, a country that realized the Palestinian cause was being used as a hollow excuse by Iran to colonize the region via proxies. They chose the Abraham Accords because they saw the 'stability' of Iran for what it was: a slow-motion disaster.

You call Israel a 'tyranny,' yet you’re writing from a monarchy while defending a theocracy. If you truly believe 'violently opposing tyranny' is a right, then you should be cheering for the Iranian people who are being murdered by their own regime, rather than justifying the missiles that regime fires at us (both of us) You’re not a champion of international law; you’re an apologist for an empire of proxies. Until you can hold the people firing the rockets to the same standard you hold the people defending against them, your 'moral compass' is just a one-way street.

Blood soaked streets in Iran after the IRGC butchered its own people:



You talk a lot about 'simple facts' and 'international law,' but here’s a basic one for you: Do you even know why that territory is called the 'West Bank' when it’s on the eastern side of Israel?

This post was edited by Many_Names on Apr 10 2026 02:48am
Member
Posts: 4,157
Joined: Dec 22 2004
Gold: 1,217.00
Apr 10 2026 03:11am
You're trapped in a circular argument. You claim Netanyahu 'funded' Hamas to stop a two-state solution, yet you ignore that Hamas’s entire reason for existing long before any funding is the total destruction of Israel. Whether it was a failed attempt at 'management' or a cynical political move, it doesn't change the fact that Hamas pulled the trigger. Blaming the victim for the attacker's agency isn't 'truth,' it’s a moral bypass.

Your talk of 'diplomacy' is a fantasy. You don't negotiate with a regime that hangs its own people and uses Lebanon, Yemen, and Gaza as human shields. Iran didn't attack Israel because of 'settlers'; they’ve been calling for our destruction since 1979, long before the current government existed. You're living in the UAE, a country that realized the Palestinian cause was being used as a hollow excuse by Iran to colonize the region via proxies. They chose the Abraham Accords because they saw the 'stability' of Iran for what it was: a slow-motion disaster.

You call Israel a 'tyranny,' yet you’re writing from a monarchy while defending a theocracy. If you truly believe 'violently opposing tyranny' is a right, then you should be cheering for the Iranian people who are being murdered by their own regime, rather than justifying the missiles that regime fires at us (both of us) You’re not a champion of international law; you’re an apologist for an empire of proxies. Until you can hold the people firing the rockets to the same standard you hold the people defending against them, your 'moral compass' is just a one-way street.


Hamas entire reason for that view is the illegal occupation and brutalization of the palestinian people and netanyahu then decides to fund it. I agree Hamas pulled the trigger. Do you agree that Netanyahu bought the materials for the gun?

Didn't Israel just vote in a law for hanging people?
Yes iran has called for the destruction of israel and israel has destroyed the palestinians since 1948. This whole thing is like 2 school shooters inside a crowded school and they're both incapable or unwilling to give peace a chance. Pathetic.

As i said again and again. I see the results of the regime. I couldn't care less whether such a regime is a monarchy or democracy or anything else. If it murders innocent civilians it needs to stop.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1119120121122123142Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll