It's ironic watching the R be OK with attacking FED officers because they are attacking the orange messiah.
Trump>God>Country>Family might be the new "mantra"

Nobody is saying violence is ok. We are just trying to highlight that people like you automatically assume government and their agents must be the good guys.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Aug 14 2022 11:30am

stop lying. literally NO ONE on the left is saying or even just suggesting that, lol. it's the other way around: right wingers are the law enforcement shills and cheer every time they brutalise / murder / disenfranchise some poor / minority person. but all of a sudden, when there's an ACTUAL crime, and law enforcement goes after someone the right likes, it's all "corrupt" and "rotten"... typical right wing hypocrisy.
to the left, police and law enforcement STILL have severe issues, and we look at them extremely critically. it's just that it doesn't mean literally everything they do is wrong by default. helping people who had an accident? good. arresting murderers? great. stopping robbers? awesome. recovering stolen nuclear secrets? positive.
only a fundamentally stupid person would assume you either support EVERYTHING or oppose EVERYTHING law enforcement does. so i guess i shouldn't be surprised that's the "logic" conservatives use...

Should Fox be held responsible for what their viewers do? Yes or no.

i already answered that question, you need to l2r. i know that fascist bootlickers don't think that targeting individual political opponents with lies and propaganda is a bad thing, but any decent human being opposes such practices.

no- but they are a shit Co. and shouldn't be looked on as news

faux news runs edited pictures, nbc edits call recordings, cbs runs forged documents. most mainstream media tabloids, i mean outlets, lie, and they are not to be trusted

This post was edited by excellence on Aug 14 2022 12:11pm

it never happened <--- ghot is there
if it happened, it was meant as a joke / meme <--- most trumpsexuals are there
if it wasn't, other media does it all the time <--- excrements made it there
if they don't, it's not so bad anyway - it's not like unhinged faux news viewers would ever kill people after listening to their propaganda
if they do, it's not faux' fault, the FBI deserve it anyway <--- jessi made it all the way there
if it is, what about the clintons / obama

lol, look at the copium. and when some unhinged faux news drone "responsible gun owner" murders a judge that was targeted on faux with a PHOTOSHOPPED image, showing them in company of trump's good friend ghislaine maxwell ("i wish her well, frankly" - AFTER all the stuff about trafficking and grooming came out), they act like it has nothing to do with that propaganda...

Says meme on the photo

not only does the average faux "news" viewer not know what a "meme" even is, kilmeade also pushed back against the notion that this "might" be a doctored photo really showing epstein, defiantly replying "it might be his plane, who knows?". he clearly intended to keep suggesting it's real (while maintaining some degree of deniability through use of vague terms), in order to rile up his viewers against the judge. that kind of stochastic terrorism is well established practice at faux, and has already cost peoples' lives in the past. anyone who isn't a fascist bootlicker would oppose such despicable practices, and not make flimsy excuses...