d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Don't Say Gay
Prev1111213141554Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 2597Replies: 538Track Topic
Member
Posts: 10,525
Joined: Feb 9 2022
Gold: 425.70
#121
Apr 16 2022 07:37am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 15 2022 11:14pm)
This is something people who repressed their homsexuality say.

People don't choose their sexuality. I never chose to be straight. If you think you chose to be straight it's because you like dick. Nothing wrong with that, but I never chose to dislike dick.



Lol okay bud



:banana:
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
#122
Apr 16 2022 07:52am
Quote (Talmid @ Apr 16 2022 08:17am)
2. A school district may not adopt procedures or student support forms that prohibit school district personnel from notifying a parent about his or her student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being, or a change in related services or monitoring, or that encourage or have the effect of encouraging a student to withhold from a parent such information. School district personnel may not discourage or prohibit parental notification of and involvement in critical decisions affecting a student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being.


This is the heart of the bill. Teachers and schools are no longer allowed to have secret conversations about sex and keep important information and decisions from the parent.

Simple Pattern of Grooming includes: Isolating the victim from their friends and family, trust development through building and keeping secrets, desensitization through sexual conversations.

The left is grooming and indoctrinating literal children into their ideology for political and cultural power.

https://www.rainn.org/news/grooming-know-warning-signs


That says nothing about secret conversations about sex. You are gaslighting us bruh.

Any conversation with the school counselor for example gets charted and discussed among peers. There is no reason to notify the parents about conversations the child doesn't want you to have with the parent.

The vast majority of child abuse is from parents.. This law makes it much more difficult for people to help children out who are in abusive situations.

This is the type of rhetoric that came out when day cares first came out...communist indoctrination collection child raising centers destroying the family....clutch your pearls the sky is falling!

You have some weird fantasies about what teachers want to do at work. No wonder so many are quitting and just making more money doing less stressful things that are more appreciated in society, like being bartenders.

This post was edited by Skinned on Apr 16 2022 07:56am
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
#123
Apr 16 2022 11:34am
Quote (Talmid @ Apr 16 2022 05:17am)
2. A school district may not adopt procedures or student support forms that prohibit school district personnel from notifying a parent about his or her student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being, or a change in related services or monitoring, or that encourage or have the effect of encouraging a student to withhold from a parent such information. School district personnel may not discourage or prohibit parental notification of and involvement in critical decisions affecting a student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being.


This is the heart of the bill. Teachers and schools are no longer allowed to have secret conversations about sex and keep important information and decisions from the parent.

Simple Pattern of Grooming includes: Isolating the victim from their friends and family, trust development through building and keeping secrets, desensitization through sexual conversations.

The left is grooming and indoctrinating literal children into their ideology for political and cultural power.

https://www.rainn.org/news/grooming-know-warning-signs


So if a student reports to their teacher that they're distressed because their father is raping them, the school has to let the father know the student told? Seems like its protecting potential groomers, not preventing them.
Member
Posts: 12,334
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
#124
Apr 16 2022 11:51am
So you think informing the parents of these kids in Florida is going to make some monumental positive change.

Lul ok.

Remember when this culture shift started parents were beating and killing thier kids for comming out like this. But I guess they were all just lefties too.
Member
Posts: 2,577
Joined: Aug 31 2020
Gold: 3,181.60
#125
Apr 16 2022 12:45pm
Quote (Sioux @ Apr 16 2022 01:34pm)
So if a student reports to their teacher that they're distressed because their father is raping them, the school has to let the father know the student told? Seems like its protecting potential groomers, not preventing them.


"This subparagraph does not prohibit a school district from adopting procedures that permit school personnel to withhold such information from a parent if a reasonably prudent person would believe that disclosure would result in abuse, abandonment, or neglect, as those terms are defined in s. 39.01."

You should probably read the bill. There as obvious exemptions for abuse and a mandatory reporting policy by law. What you described would be a mandated report to the police and CPS. A teacher would face jail and criminal charges for not reporting the suspected abuse and would also face charges for informing the abuser about the report.

This post was edited by Talmid on Apr 16 2022 12:45pm
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
#126
Apr 16 2022 01:14pm
Quote (Talmid @ Apr 16 2022 02:45pm)
"This subparagraph does not prohibit a school district from adopting procedures that permit school personnel to withhold such information from a parent if a reasonably prudent person would believe that disclosure would result in abuse, abandonment, or neglect, as those terms are defined in s. 39.01."

You should probably read the bill. There as obvious exemptions for abuse and a mandatory reporting policy by law. What you described would be a mandated report to the police and CPS. A teacher would face jail and criminal charges for not reporting the suspected abuse and would also face charges for informing the abuser about the report.


The fact that the Left called it the Don't Say Gay bill pretty much proves none of them read it or even understand it.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
#127
Apr 16 2022 01:22pm
Quote (fuzzy159 @ Apr 16 2022 02:14pm)
The fact that the Left called it the Don't Say Gay bill pretty much proves none of them read it or even understand it.


It's called that because when presented with a question like "Why does Little Timmy have 2 dads?" the teacher is legally not allowed to say why.

It's a nickname given to the bill to show the idiocy that arises from it not show that it's the entire point of it.
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
#128
Apr 16 2022 01:29pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Apr 16 2022 03:22pm)
It's called that because when presented with a question like "Why does Little Timmy have 2 dads?" the teacher is legally not allowed to say why.

It's a nickname given to the bill to show the idiocy that arises from it not show that it's the entire point of it.


That is fucking stupid. That is a question for parents. Who gives a fuck that a teacher can't answer that.
Member
Posts: 2,577
Joined: Aug 31 2020
Gold: 3,181.60
#129
Apr 16 2022 01:31pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Apr 16 2022 03:22pm)
It's called that because when presented with a question like "Why does Little Timmy have 2 dads?" the teacher is legally not allowed to say why.

It's a nickname given to the bill to show the idiocy that arises from it not show that it's the entire point of it.


That is actually not prohibited in the bill.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
#130
Apr 16 2022 01:45pm
Quote (fuzzy159 @ Apr 16 2022 02:29pm)
That is fucking stupid. That is a question for parents. Who gives a fuck that a teacher can't answer that.


It's their job to educate not about realities not hide children from it. You get up in arms when a young earth creationist gets angry over dinosaurs in textbooks to?

Quote (Talmid @ Apr 16 2022 02:31pm)
That is actually not prohibited in the bill.


It's the problem of section 3. The vagueness of "state standards" which don't really exist.

Be like if i said "You can eat that sandwich, but only within state standards for sandwich eating". Those don't exist so you effectively don't get to eat a sandwich.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Apr 16 2022 01:45pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1111213141554Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact