So you saying it doesn't matter when Obama and the Clintons do it, but it does when Trump supposedly did it. Even after almost a year with no evidence?

It doesn't appear that the NYT, formerly a newspaper of record, had anywhere in their article anything about this well-placed source who is barred by an NDA with the FBI from disclosing crucial details.

Not 'doesn't matter'. Of course it matters. But it has no bearing on who should be in the white house right now.

dude, you're so far right that you make sean hannity look like rachel maddow

Dude is just blinded by ideology. Not really his fault. He's too old to learn to think critically now.

kek
e
k

r news is a safe space ?

Really, I'm more liberal. BUT with all the crap that the Dems and possibly Russia have be stirring up, I think it's safer to lean a tad ...right.





Got straight As in my Crit classes in college. I've just had more time to practice with it.
My favorite pastime is finding the loopholes in commercials, and political flummary.


/e



Well it definitely bears on the fact that Hillary shouldn't be in the white house.
I mean Trump is no peach, but Hillary is just plain EVIL.

This post was edited by Ghot on Oct 18 2017 11:20am

So this isn’t about Rosatom purchasing a 51% stake in Uranium One so they could enrich uranium for the United States (which is totally fine and mutually beneficial), it’s about the FBI potentially knowing about cash kickbacks to the Clinton Foundation. I sincerely wish this was the cover story and not the propagandist “Russia controls 20% of American uranium” tripe being used as a smokescreen to make Trump’s Russia collusion “okay” because... “I’m rubber, you’re glue”

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Oct 18 2017 12:00pm