Quote (Pollster @ Apr 14 2016 11:32pm)
I don't know how *anyone* can support one of the other 4 choices given who they are, unless they have a personal opposition to abortion that they let overrule all other considerations. Clinton is obviously far more qualified than the rest, and none of them come anywhere close to addressing the major concern that everyone should have that they're prepared for the job, based on the policy proposals they've made and their record in government.
It's true that Kasich and Sanders wouldn't be the absolute disaster that Cruz and Trump would be, but that still doesn't mean it wouldn't be a mistake to vote for them. I just laugh when people volunteer that they're considering voting for any of those people. It's just crazy to me. There may have never been a clearer sign of people not knowing what they don't know.
Clinton flip flops more than Romney, and that's saying something. She has very few deeply held beliefs, she will compromise any position if her donors or public opinion sways a certain way. She is running for president for her own narcissistic pride of being the first woman president, like Obama wanting to be the first black pres. Obama gets away with it more because he is a smoother operator, and frankly is a lot smarter than her.
They are all big government types, and follow Keynesian theory. For the 2nd election running I will be writing in Ron Paul in the general election.