Quote (Scaly @ Sep 17 2014 11:17am)
Trollololol
Corporal punishment is the tool of the lower classes. In civilised society there is no need for such barbarism and it is right to be named a criminal act and abuse.
Because you'll just explain to a child with the intellectual development of a potato the rational pros and cons of their actions weighted one against each other in a utilitarian philosophy so they can comprehend the ramifications of their actions?
No.
Humans understand pain as a deterrent, that is the entire reason pain exists. The use of pain to condition human behaviour is natural, and to dispense with its need only comes with civilized discourse between enlightened individuals, your "civilized society" something that presumes intellectual capacity of all subjects, something you won't get out of an ickle whiny toerag. There are plenty of tools to use
before and in place of pain- positive reinforcement, shouting, loud noises, grounding, etc. But in many cases they are simply ineffective deterrents and there is a palpable need for physical discipline. Like any tool, it can be misused, but with proper adjustment, its corrective applications are unparalleled.
To treat corporal punishment as haraam is to bend over for political correctness in the face of nature, science, tradition and results. It is to take a step backwards and rigorously enforce a culture of coddling that produces a lower quality product, a spoiled brat or burned out druggie where there could have been a nobel laureate or professional athlete.
This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 17 2014 11:28am