Quote (Ylem122 @ Oct 16 2013 05:45am)
an eye for an eye and turn the other cheek in reguards to how the one who is damamged should act, very clearly contradict each other.
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Oct 16 2013 07:33am)
yes, you keep saying that, but you cant seem to bring any proof.
lets take this one step at a time. do you agree to the following:
according to jesus, if you damage someone you should repay them. if someone damages you, you should forgive them and not try to collect from them.
without getting into anything else, answer me that, please. agree or disagree?
it looks like you left already, so ill just finish up the point so its there for you when you come back, since i know what youre going to say since youve said it already.
the answer is that yes, youd agree to that.
now, the crux of our difference is that you are comparing that to the christian interpretation of eye for an eye, and saying that it contradicts that. thats all well and good, but its not the issue. the issue is whether what jesus said contradicts judaism and the jewish interpretation of the commandments. i tell you as someone who knows well the jewish interpretations of the commandments, that there is no contradiction there. if jesus would say that to a rabbi they would tell him 'ok, thats fine, youre free to do that.' what jesus is saying is to go beyond the letter of the law in a manner which is permissible and fits within the law. there is no contradiction.