d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Science And Faith Fixed
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 62,215
Joined: Jun 3 2007
Gold: 9,039.20
Jun 11 2013 03:21am
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 10 2013 11:47pm)
I think the idea is that most atheists rely on science as a prescriptive worldview rather than merely as a methodology.

A non-religious life seems devoid of any objective meaning, and the pursuit of empirical knowledge for many is a replacement for the purpose that only the religious have. It is a way to avoid the existential angst that comes with a lack of belief in God.

Most atheists go a step further: they believe in naturalism (almost universally). Naturalism is a philosophy not based in any external evidence, yet nearly all atheists follow its tenets. This I think is a better way to consider the concept of "faith in science", as it is actually "faith in naturalism".


:thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 11 2013 04:59am
Quote (brmv @ Jun 11 2013 02:29am)
another speculation, you haven't heard of secular humanism? or nihilism?
there are a few philosophical worldviews open to atheists and agnostics
just because you have some sort of 'faith' does not mean that others need to rely on a substitute
talking here about genuine atheists and agnostics who have reflected on the issue
and not the little kids who run around and claim to be atheists


Very few people are nihilists, but it is indeed a possibility.

Secular humanism is even closer to the concept of "faith" than naturalism and is completely without empirical basis. Again, most atheists tend to be secular humanists (even though it is completely outside the bounds of their epistemology).
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jun 11 2013 06:00am
Quote (Voyaging @ 11 Jun 2013 10:59)
Very few people are nihilists, but it is indeed a possibility.
Secular humanism is even closer to the concept of "faith" than naturalism and is completely without empirical basis. Again, most atheists tend to be secular humanists (even though it is completely outside the bounds of their epistemology).


:wallbash: :rofl:

actually i forgot one comment to your

It is a way to avoid the existential angst that comes with a lack of belief in God

religion (especially the institutionalised) is the creator of existential angst
just because you experience it does not mean it applies to those who do not hold a belief
your comments make me really wonder what they are teaching in this regard in the usa
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 11 2013 06:24am
Quote (brmv @ Jun 11 2013 08:00am)
:wallbash:  :rofl:

actually i forgot one comment to your

It is a way to avoid the existential angst that comes with a lack of belief in God

religion (especially the institutionalised) is the creator of existential angst
just because you experience it does not mean it applies to those who do not hold a belief
your comments make me really wonder what they are teaching in this regard in the usa


Maybe absurdism is a better term to use than angst. Either way, existentialism was largely propagated by atheists so I'm not sure where you get the idea that the concept comes from religion from.

They rarely teach existentialism in the US because it earns very little respect among professional philosophers.

Why is it so funny that there is a discord with the atheists who rely on empiricism as the SOLE method through which knowledge is gained, yet follow secular humanism which holds beliefs that are gained without any empirical evidence?

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jun 11 2013 06:27am
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jun 11 2013 06:36am
Quote (brmv @ Jun 11 2013 08:00am)
:wallbash:  :rofl:

actually i forgot one comment to your

It is a way to avoid the existential angst that comes with a lack of belief in God

religion (especially the institutionalised) is the creator of existential angst
just because you experience it does not mean it applies to those who do not hold a belief
your comments make me really wonder what they are teaching in this regard in the usa


...you clearly do not understand the concept of existential angst . You are blaming organized religion for your own fears and anxieties when it is the rejection of your religious past that is likely the root cause .
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jun 11 2013 07:09am
Quote (Voyaging @ 11 Jun 2013 12:24)
Maybe absurdism is a better term to use than angst. Either way, existentialism was largely propagated by atheists so I'm not sure where you get the idea that the concept comes from religion from.
They rarely teach existentialism in the US because it earns very little respect among professional philosophers.
Why is it so funny that there is a discord with the atheists who rely on empiricism as the SOLE method through which knowledge is gained, yet follow secular humanism which holds beliefs that are gained without any empirical evidence?


in case you are not aware of it: very few american philosophers are respected in europe and those who are are/were mainly immigrants from europe
Member
Posts: 2,664
Joined: Dec 4 2011
Gold: 6.66
Jun 11 2013 09:11am
Quote (brmv @ Jun 11 2013 02:00pm)
:wallbash:  :rofl:

actually i forgot one comment to your

It is a way to avoid the existential angst that comes with a lack of belief in God

religion (especially the institutionalised) is the creator of existential angst
just because you experience it does not mean it applies to those who do not hold a belief
your comments make me really wonder what they are teaching in this regard in the usa


anything can be a creator of existential angst :huh:

it doesn't even have anything to do with what creates it, it's something a lot more general.

Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 11 2013 05:16pm)
It's not taken seriously by European professional philosophers either, only those on the fringe.


how do you know this? it sounds to me more like a matter of preference

This post was edited by Neptunus on Jun 11 2013 09:20am
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 11 2013 09:16am
Quote (brmv @ Jun 11 2013 09:09am)
in case you are not aware of it: very few american philosophers are respected in europe and those who are are/were mainly immigrants from europe


It's not taken seriously by European professional philosophers either, only those on the fringe.

Many American philosophers are respected in Europe.
Member
Posts: 62,215
Joined: Jun 3 2007
Gold: 9,039.20
Jun 11 2013 09:24am
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 11 2013 09:16am)
It's not taken seriously by European professional philosophers either, only those on the fringe.

Many American philosophers are respected in Europe.


There are not many philosophers anywhere that even carry their own weight, the only contemporary one I can think of is Žižek.

I mean the only serious American philosopher in a while has been Rawl :(

This post was edited by killgoreisleet on Jun 11 2013 09:37am
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 11 2013 09:39am
Quote (killgoreisleet @ Jun 11 2013 11:24am)
There are not many philosophers anywhere that even carry their own weight, the only contemporary one I can think of is Žižek.


nn pop philosophy

There are at least a hundred worthwhile philosophers currently alive and Žižek ain't one of 'em.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll