"This guy gets it"

Ahh yes now I see it... How could ive been so blind





This post was edited by Metalwise4u on Jul 29 2024 09:20pm

Just do a little reading into why LGBTQ+ people identify with "Krishna" and you'll have more answers.

Wasn't trying to belittle you for not knowing Krishna. I'm giving you reasons why Krishna's symbolism is used by queers.

I never know if youre the cool guy i can play hc with while your wifes away or the guy who ignores me when amen Ra gets off'd by a crown of thorned hulks on the glitched frigid mountain tops used to duplicate item codes for lord shenk himself.

help me out a little for leaking you the esoteric secrets of the universe;
So just remember, when your backs up against the dragon's spiritual wall, to dodge the tiger uppercut & sonic booms because their chariot lurks behind the ever thinning veil:





Only the strongest Olympic athletes gonna' survive the new age gladiator arena called life.
they too busy lost in the game to see whats going on in the background.

the natives are always 1 step ahead i think.

If it is then it is. Greek gods come in all shapes and sizes including colors. That's all that I saw when I watched the opening. Didn't see any resemblance to the "Last Supper" either. Think more people see it being an issue with Trans people and Christianity more then anything.

But like you said its an issue with "Krishna" also

This post was edited by Metalwise4u on Jul 29 2024 10:15pm

&&& there is nothing wrong with that.

I enjoy contemporary art too.

Do I think the people in that ceremony were trying to "offend people". Not really. Were the organizers? Up to debate.

The reason I brought up Krishna is to show you that not everyone sees the same thing even when their looking at the exact same image.

edit: Because it's the Olympics they tried to get all "religions" essentially in one image(without Mohamad for security reasons).

Christians get offended much easier than Hindus when it comes to "imagery".

Being a cross dresser or a man who acts as a woman or a woman who acts as a man has never been uncommon in India.

For thousands of years they've done the whole LGBTQ+ "movement" without all the "look at me".

That's because its been a part of Hindu culture for thousands of years prior to the "Last Supper".

Would I as a man have rather seen a beautiful woman as Krishna and not a potbelly middle aged man. Yes. That's art though.

This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Jul 29 2024 10:25pm

If an Indian saw a bearded man in a dress they would rape them, then when confronted about the rape they would come up with some excuse blaming lower people in the caste system.

If you put a bunch of people doing hand poses on a single side of a long white table with a central figure in the middle wreathed in a halo, you're aping the last supper. Full stop. If you cite a 17th century work homaging the 16th century last supper, it just makes you both ignorant and blasphemous. Whatever other symbolism or other imagery you do afterwards doesn't negate the prior display somehow

Then you add a guy dangling one of his nuts in front of the camera to rub it in.

No worries they got to defend this shit