If thats true I've been trolled

Its was very obvious if you were watching the news at any time during the primaries.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/mitt-romney-presidential-race-speech/

irony.





http://nypost.com/2017/02/15/trump-blames-clinton-for-media-reports-on-his-russian-ties/

Snowball sneaking on to the farm to sabotage the windmill...

This post was edited by thesnipa on Feb 15 2017 07:49am

Someday never Trump shills will understand that we dont care about their opinions. They were wrong since day one and they live in perpetual denial.

the ironic posts just keep coming.

never trump was a voting block. i accept some of the things he's doing as good, unlike you shills who suck him off for both the good and the bad. you idiots never got out of the election, hopefully someday soon you'll wake up and actually start posting with more quality again. no credibility, or accuracy, but some quality would be nice.

http://www.houstonpress.com/news/animal-welfare-groups-sue-usda-over-purged-records-9199495

biased writing but im curious if anyone has insight into the positives of this move by the USDA. i understand taking down LGBT pages and other things to rework them for the new administration, that makes total sense and is a fake news headline. this move to purge documents though seems a bit more weird to me.



and another:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slams-un-american-intelligence-leaks-just-like-russia-132915549.html

i guess i'm just left wondering when the "ok, people actually like me when they get to know me" and "we're gonna bring people together" stuff is gonna take effect. I blasted the leaks on HRC as a troubling trend even though i was happy to watch the witch burn. now its on an acting POTUS who's whitehouse could leak classified info. its hard enough to govern without leaks, with them its impossible. this ship needs to be plugged or it will sink. a full scale investigation into Flynn would prob appease some of the leakers, but lets not pretend that this isn't a financial opportunity for some.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Feb 15 2017 09:23am

There really isn't any positives, they're just caving to shareholders that don't want to look bad because of the reports.

I was especially tickled when they said they were being transparent by removing the documents.

that line also made me grin. like..... wtf

It does set a dangerous precedent though, if the USDA is going to start pandering to shareholders over reports that paint them in a bad light, who knows what else they're going to do.

afk investing in snake oil farms now!