d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev1117118119120121424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 19235Replies: 4231Track Topic
Member
Posts: 27,157
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
#1181
Nov 7 2021 08:53pm
Quote (ChocolateCoveredGummyBears @ 7 Nov 2021 21:22)
good thing you're on jsp and not on the jury lol


indeed lol
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1182
Nov 7 2021 09:07pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 7 2021 08:47pm)
I'm considered a "far right trumptard" here from my experience.

https://i.imgur.com/CLuyDMF.png


In my experience surveys like this aren't very accurate. People will say they value things, then vote and argue positions that are fundamentally against it.
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#1183
Nov 7 2021 09:11pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 7 2021 06:47pm)
I'm considered a "far right trumptard" here from my experience.

https://i.imgur.com/CLuyDMF.png


wots that from?

Also leftists who attack other leftists because they dont agree with on everything.

I can only imagine how you wouldnt see this as self defense. Turning it in to politics yuckkk
Member
Posts: 36,711
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
#1184
Nov 7 2021 09:12pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 7 2021 10:11pm)
wots that from?

Also leftists who attack other leftists because they dont agree with on everything.

I can only imagine how you wouldnt see this as self defense. Turning it in to politics yuckkk


https://www.politicalcompass.org/
Member
Posts: 6,701
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
#1185
Nov 7 2021 09:32pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 1 2021 03:14pm)
He might get off on that based on self defense, but he isn't going to get off on going across state lines with a firearm he had illegally.

He might not get off on self defense though, since we have a paper trail a mile long showing him associating with far right radicals who went there specifically to get violent, and even his self-proclaimed intention was to defend somebody else's property that he had no business being at and that was already burned the night before so there was nothing left to defend.

So it's gonna be a toss up.



Just wanna point out how wrong everything mister scientist said in the beginning of this thread.
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#1186
Nov 7 2021 09:33pm
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Nov 7 2021 07:32pm)
Just wanna point out how wrong everything mister scientist said in the beginning of this thread.


Well it's a nice sight to see that dude kinda admit it was self defense.

Hes still bringing politics in to it though ugg

This post was edited by aaron9999 on Nov 7 2021 09:35pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#1187
Nov 7 2021 09:35pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 7 2021 09:33pm)
Well it's a nice sight to see that dude kinda admit it was self defense.


My position has never been that he's guilty. My position has always been "it's complicated and will be decided by the jury". I've only given the reasons why it's not cut and dry, and people got triggered that I wasn't immediately declaring it self defense lol.
Member
Posts: 6,701
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
#1188
Nov 7 2021 09:36pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 7 2021 10:33pm)
Well it's a nice sight to see that dude kinda admit it was self defense.



Even better to see every assumption he made be debunked by the opening statements of the trial
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#1189
Nov 7 2021 09:36pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 7 2021 07:35pm)
My position has never been that he's guilty. My position has always been "it's complicated and will be decided by the jury". I've only given the reasons why it's not cut and dry, and people got triggered that I wasn't immediately declaring it self defense lol.


I'm not triggered at all. You're bringing someone's person politics in weather or not it was legally self defense. Laws shouldn't change for a citizen based on political views.
Member
Posts: 6,701
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
#1190
Nov 7 2021 09:40pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 7 2021 10:35pm)
My position has never been that he's guilty. My position has always been "it's complicated and will be decided by the jury". I've only given the reasons why it's not cut and dry, and people got triggered that I wasn't immediately declaring it self defense lol.



“He crossed state lines with a gun”

Gun was locked at his buddy’s camp outside the city

“He intended on being violent with his far right extremist friends”

Kid is being interviewed that night explaining he was there to help protect people, exits the interview mid sentence to offer assistance as an EMT.

“The fires were all from the night before”

The entire incident started because he extinguished a fire and the suicidal child molester got mad



If you can find any credibility for sale I will be happy to donate the fg to cover it.

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Nov 7 2021 09:41pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1117118119120121424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact