u said "find that reference" so i did

before the internet i was plagued by a phrase "price check on prune juice bob, price check". for nearly 10 years i couldnt place it, but i thought of it nearly every day. then at age 18 i rewatched Fern Gully. thank god for google, typing that phrase in now gives u an instant answer.

"Dave's not here, man".
"No man, this is Dave, open the door".
"Dave's not here, man".




/e




This post was edited by Ghot on Feb 6 2020 10:10am

I'm happy to be the last voter who supports fiscal responsibility, compromise, and decency.

IF you were, HRC would probably have you suicided.

That's fantastic that you care, and i'm sure if we were to do a survey vast majority of Americans would say the same. Where the break down in agreement happens is that comes at a cost, higher taxes or reduced spending in which case once again vast majority of Americans would be against those two things.

So politicians aren't going to commit political suicide by going after entitlements or vastly higher taxes, hence even why the Democrats don't want people like Bernie to get into office. Again this isn't about Trump and what he's doing isn't drastically different when it comes to fiscal policy that the average tax cutting military loving republican would have done. You just think it is because you're so hyper focused on him failing to even notice recent historical realities.

Anyways,



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-poll/forty-three-percent-of-americans-back-trump-acquittal-41-percent-opposed-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN2002WH

Right thing happened. Let democracy decide what happens in 2020 instead of bureaucrats.

It's a silly argument. I haven't heard anyone making it who thinks Trump's actions warrant him getting voted out of office. It's essentially saying "Trump shouldn't face any consequences for his actions, but I'm going to hide behind the democracy argument".

Consequences for something that’s only deemed wrong by his political opponents.

Removing Trump from office for this would have been an egregious disregard for democracy. I get it you don’t like him but at least have some respect for democracy?

A 43-41 split with 17% undecided and the great majority of both Republicans and Democrats wanting witnesses in the Senate trial.

Perhaps the right result happened, but the process was a sham and there is still plenty of missing info.

You're about 3 weeks behind. The talking point has been for quite a while that what he did was definitely bad, and illegal, but not bad enough to remove from office over.