Quote (Beowulf @ Jun 27 2019 07:48pm)
Jones and Crowder have massive audiences
friends of them have massive audiences
the numbers are there for change but what do they have all the snowflakes doing? paying for subs, buying this buying that, donating to the cause which is actually just their profit
they don't have the peons doing shit because they don't want them to do anything other than donate
yall sit around and complain and pay for their toys, there is a serious lack of bootstraps within this portion of the conservative group
Crowder is not making money for being deplatformed, because he wasn't. He's making money because he was demonetized, but allowed to continue producing content.
As Maza pointed out, demonetization doesn't work against established channels; Youtube creators have long since learned to diversify their income streams to insulate themselves against Youtube caprice and unpredictable ad revenue.
Even so, I'm sure that Crowder didn't want it to play out like this at all. He gets the last laugh because Youtube chose not to terminate his account to avoid publish and partner backlash. They're receiving backlash from the left and their own employees instead. Who knows how this would play out if we ran it a second time, or how it will play out if similar situations occur in the future. If Crowder were to lose his channel, he'd find it increasingly difficult to grow his audience, and all acts get stale.
Is Alex Jones making more money now, or earlier? No idea, because he has fallen off the map. You sound sure, so I'll wait for you to breakdown his finances for me.
---
You really need to stop focusing on ecelebrities, though. That's no ones primary focus. The concern is that we know that algorithms are being used to blacklist "sensitive content", or in Google's words, to ensure that "authoritative" voices are heard. Unsurprising for a company notoriously hostile to internal conservative voices, but they have a very particular idea of what that means.