http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=74580088&f=119&p=504305707

In your own words, could you put your comments into a tasteful context?

You can find the exact same interaction where you brought this exact same thing up from a few+ days ago to find my response

I realize Trump enthusiasts like doing the exact same thing over and over again but I don't

oral arguments live

"it is not in the record"

sums everything up right there

"Could the president hypothetically say muslims are banned"
"Thats not what the order does"
"Could he though?"
"Thats not what the order does"
"But could he??"

straw manning pretty hard here. They're asking him to argue against a tangent

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 7 2017 05:26pm

this is way more entertaining than one would expect

Pretty easy to see why these guys set the record for number of verdicts overturned by the supreme court

not going your way?

fake judges?
liberal law?

what are we gonna roll with

Alternative irreparable harms?

He finally settled on one "Any establishment clause violation is automatically irreparable harm for the purposes of a TRO regardless of actual harms because I said so"

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 7 2017 05:40pm

Americas president is a goof.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/07/media/murder-rate-donald-trump-media-conspiracy-theories/




This post was edited by said_aouita on Feb 7 2017 05:55pm