Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 26 2021 09:47am)
1. the move to texas based solely on the fact that Powell lives in texas is silly. as is her argument that a presidential election has no bearing in DC. especially as the states she lists where election fraud potentially took place (Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc) does not include Texas. If anything as the most extreme fraud allegation that Powell made is that Dominion bribed the election official in Georgia, the case should be transferred there.
2. Powell's argument that defamation doesn't apply because her claims are (by Dominion's lawsuit) outlandish, AND that they dont apply because her information is unverifiable are both null. Defamation doesnt get eliminated because the statements are outlandish, it very much includes outlandish statements, and the only qualifier is damage to a third party, which Powell doesn't claim Dominion avoided. Additionally she filed court documents in several states claiming her case was strong, and verifiable, via affidavits she claimed where so compelling that the 4th amendment for search and seizure protection for Dominion property machines did not apply, and thus the govt. should seize them to be investigated.
i dont need to reference anything. if u cant handle arguing then yes to leave for a while. we all know ur scared to read and prove me wrong lol. run now boy, back to GC with u child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmc21V-zBq0
im on page 20. its your turn to read some of it. this time i pick out your arguments.
1. the move to texas based solely on the fact that Powell lives in texas is silly.
(cite in the document where it says that.)
"especially as the states she lists where election fraud potentially took place (Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc) does not include Texas. "
(cite in the document why that would make a difference)
"If anything as the most extreme fraud allegation that Powell made is that Dominion bribed the election official in Georgia, the case should be transferred there."
(cite where in the document that should be the case?)
is what we have personal arguments and has fuk all to do with the court document?????????
2. Powell's argument that defamation doesn't apply because her claims are (by Dominion's lawsuit) outlandish, AND that they dont apply because her information is unverifiable are both null.
(state in the document where it claims otherwise)
dominion, a canadian company, what the fuk are they doin over here with their nose in USA election process???????