Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 27 2019 10:37am)
maybe if these people got less exposure, instead of more as a result of this activity, we'd see a right winged twitter emerge.
but, alas, they get more and more followers and more and more attention. so they stay. so that people can act like this is doomsday, and give them more follows.
meanwhile the robots continues to be assembled, quicker and quicker it comes together as the underbelly of unrest grows. you'll see, you'll all see.
Social media companies have long since realized that they can exploit their monopolies to suppress people with incremental and algorithmic censorship far more effectively than direct bans
If Trump and every Trump supporter were banned from Twitter, they'd hard break and prop up an alternative platform.
But keep slicing away by rigging search results, hiding comments, inserting labels, restricting features- and they can hope to drain their energy and exposure and silence them more than direct censorship could accomplish.
Its those dramatic bans and direct intervention that give people something to rally against. Steve Huffman directly edits comments critical of him and gets caught? A big shitstorm emerges.
Not the case for gradually ramping up the censorship pressure. There might be short term hostility, but what happens when T_D is still quarantined in a week from now? A month? Six months?
Its guerrilla tactics. Either someone will decide enough is enough and lead an anti-censorship crusade, like Trump with direct regulatory intervention, or the incremental and algorithmic rigging will add up