she is getting her day in court now and they are making a laughing stock out of her. she's been forced to say her "rock solid proof" was "just her opinion" and that "no one should take her seriously" as well as claiming the presidential election fraud case has "nothing to do with Washington DC".

u also claimed her evidence weakens over time, but all of her "evidence" is affidavits. those havent weakened at all, and none of the witnesses died. so ur claim there is silly too.

u also claim she didnt get her day in court, but she did, and on those days in court cases in several states her evidence was too weak to show a case. witnesses alone aren't a case worthy of having when all they have is suspicion. otherwise i could say "i think i saw TiStuff had illegal porn on his computer" then demand the govt seizes ur computer. this is a basic function of the 4th amendment with presumption of innocence and reasonable suspicion in due process.

whats clear i u dont have any idea how the courts work, u just think its crooked judges and deepstate fuckery. you're lost.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 24 2021 05:59am

It's coming el oh el

lets go over this. its hard to tell whats legit when a leftie spins the narrative

"Quote
In their lawsuit, Dominion described Ms Powell's claims as "wild accusations" and "outlandish claims".
And now Ms Powell's legal team is arguing Dominion's description is evidence she should not be taken seriously.

(dominion describes powells claims are "wild accusations" and "outlandish claims".
by dominions own words she should not be taking seriously. she is using their own claims against them. its a maneuver not an admission. She is using dominions blunder.

"several states her evidence was too weak to show a case."
(it goes with your narrative your so you go with it. you would be screamin at the sky and be in the streets Burning Looting and Murdering if roles were switched. It is just your "opinion" that the judges were on the up and up .............this time.)

you said: "u also claimed her evidence weakens over time,"
(this is the way you lefties fuk the narrative and why i call you frauds. evidence would be in the machines that were denied access to i bet they are gone now. other physical evidence that would have disappeared by now. Kinda obvious dominion all full of bluster now but were hiding and peeping like a mouse then.)

you said: "i think i saw TiStuff had illegal porn on his computer" then demand the govt seizes ur computer."
(thats idiotic we are not talking about 1 persons testimony.)

you said: "this is a basic function of the 4th amendment with presumption of innocence and reasonable suspicion in due process."
(it has nothing to do with human rights it was about election integrity and its a fail when they played hot potato and wussed out)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
this leftie narrative is going to be a lose and ev1 will know it when its all played out then the lefties will move on to their next fraud.
The latest fraud was calling the latest shooting "white " supremacy. when the dude was from syria. you lefties its just one fraud after the other.

This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 24 2021 08:24am

Snipa is a shit poster confirmed, but at least he was honest enough to admit it, the other cowards do not.

just fyi for sake of the energy of a long post.

1. it's not a blunder, its their claim for defamation. if something isn't wild and outlandish, aka credible, then its not defamation

2. the legal definition for defamation doenst exclude uncredible statements, credibility is not only not an exclusion its basically what the law is for



aka: does it injure the 3rd party or not. if it's true, and verifiable or even credible, then it doesnt apply and Dominion's case would be null. HOWEVER Powell's defense is NOT that it's credible and verifiable, its that it's unverifiable and her opinion. she's not maneuvering, she's flailing.



i have no opinion on the credibility of the individual judges that threw her cases out, i have a strong opinion about the weakness of her evidence package. as i stated all along. it was weak af.



even in the affidavits no one claimed they witnessed vote switching, there was a few that claimed it was possible, or that it was possible to hook them up to the internet, but no one at any time verified this was true. Texas, the state that rejected the machines, could not make this happen even after days of testing their security.



since you clearly dont know what 4A is or how to use google:



so u cant just sieze machines without just cause, Powell failed to illustrate that. per the due process clause in 5A and 14A. google those if you need to catch up.



again, im all for the idea that the election was rigged. i think its unlikely but entirely possible. and if it was ever done it would have been done to get a guy like trump out because democrats hated him. but their is no proof. there is a shitbag of sworn statements not subject to perjury because of mistake of fact (even tho rudy lied and said they are) and they were rightfully thrown out. and are now subject to a defamation suit.

i know you wont read this for context tho, i expect a leftie and fraud laden response from a spamming nitwit.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 24 2021 08:45am

Q Cucks gonna drill themselves to the center of the planet, at the rate they're spinning.

TiStuff, 2021, colorized:



InB4 Jeebus boy comes in with a deflection about my preference in snack foods.

lets look on the positive, im teaching this foreign mutt what the US constitution is. people raised in rubble strewn shitholes think the gubment should be able to sieze things based on wild accusations, and that wild accusers should be allowed to speak recklessly. maybe in a few pages he'll be on par with a US 4th grade civics student.

explains your brain lesion brain damage

cheefy poofs
Ingredients list:
Enriched yellow corn (yellow corn, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, niacin, ferrous sulfate, folic acid), vegetable oil (contains one or more of: corn oil, sunflower oil, canola oil), whey, corn starch, salt, color blend (whey, yellow 5, yellow 6), monosodium glutamate, lactic acid, cheese blend (whey, cheddar cheese [whole milk, culture, salt, enzymes], salt, butter, buttermilk, disodium phosphate, natural flavors, yellow 6, oleoresin turmeric), maltodextrin, natural & artificial flavors, citric acid, yellow 6 lake, yellow 5 lake, fructose.
Substances or products causing allergies or intolerances: Milk, Buttermilk

Just admit you're a glutton that cant help yourself, I can work w/ that fear you satan luster

Still waiting for your response to my posts regarding the 2 year gap in your evidence logic.

This post was edited by lodd222 on Mar 24 2021 09:23am

you said: "i know you wont read this for context tho, i expect a leftie and fraud laden response from a spamming nitwit."
(ok let me give you one. this leftie fraud narrative going to crash and burn like all the other leftie fraud narratives and then you will move onto the next leftie fraud narrative.)

Now look at how much a "megadose" is, and see if that's a realistic amount for a person to eat in snack foods.

Spoiler, it isn't, and another spoiler, MSG has never ever been linked to issues in humans at doses you eat, and is in fact found in huge quantities in every food containing protein because glutamine is an amino acid and your body breaks down proteins into amino acids, so we have incredibly efficient regulatory mechanisms to make sure they go where they need to go and not elsewhere.